2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air-blown gasification of Solid Recovered Fuels (SRFs) in lab-scale bubbling fluidized-bed: Influence of the operating conditions and of the SRF composition

Abstract: This article investigates the gasification of Solid Recovered Fuels (SRFs). To better understand the influence of SRF composition on gasification efficiency and syngas quality, two industrial SRFs having different compositions were studied. A detailed SRF characterization was performed (elemental analysis; ash composition; LHV; fraction of biomass, non-biomass, and inert materials) to precisely describe the chemical complexity of such materials. The gasification tests were performed at pilot-scale in a bubblin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(56 reference statements)
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gasification efficiency was evaluated based on four indicators: cold gas efficiency (CGE), carbon conversion (CC), syngas lower heating value (LHVsyngas), and the syngas yield (ηsyngas). A previous article has presented the effect of gasification conditions on these 4 indicators for two SRFs (one rich in biomass and glass, and a second richer in plastics) [78]. The present article supplements this previous study with another SRF which exhibits an interesting composition between biomassrich SRF and plastic-rich SRF.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Gasification efficiency was evaluated based on four indicators: cold gas efficiency (CGE), carbon conversion (CC), syngas lower heating value (LHVsyngas), and the syngas yield (ηsyngas). A previous article has presented the effect of gasification conditions on these 4 indicators for two SRFs (one rich in biomass and glass, and a second richer in plastics) [78]. The present article supplements this previous study with another SRF which exhibits an interesting composition between biomassrich SRF and plastic-rich SRF.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Due to the lower presence of oxygen, the lower the ER, the higher the tar yield. Even though the use of in-bed dolomite is expected to lead to lower tar concentration due to its catalytic effect, ,, this effect was not observed here when using dolomite as bed material, as the tar yields measured when using dolomite (experiment 6) were similar to those measured for the similar ER, but using sand as bed material (experiments 1 and 3). More experiments should be conducted in order to evaluate the catalytic effect of dolomite on tar cracking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The LHV of the product gas varies from 4.0 to 5.3 MJ/kg of dry gas. The results shown in Figure a show a tendency for a linear decrease in the LHV with ER, which is explained by the combustion of the light gas with oxygen and the dilution of the caused by the N 2 fed with the air. , The steam addition, filter temperature, and bed material did not impact the LHV or the gasification efficiency. The CGE varies from 64.4% to 71.0%, and in agreement with previous observations, the CGE decreases with ER. , The same tendency is observed for the HGE, which varied from 81.4% to 85.8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…There are plenty of literature studies that investigated the thermochemical conversion of renewable fuels [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, only a few of them addressed their fluid dynamical context.…”
Section: Srf Bark Sunflower Shell Wheat Straw Lignitementioning
confidence: 99%