2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AIMOES: Archive information assisted multi-objective evolutionary strategy for ab initio protein structure prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure ɣL[g+g+] is the most stable found along the surface conformation of N-For-L-Cys-NH2 .According to our knowledge, a conformational and electronic study of energetically favored conformations of N-For-L-Cys-NH2diamide at HF/3-21G and B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) (Zamora et al, 2002), shows that the most stable structure (global minimum) of this system adopts the structure ɣL [g+g+].in this work we found the same result with our technical computing AM1/GA-MNC. Results revealed that this techniques is useful for the generation of molecular structures constituting the conformational space of protein and could possibly be extended for the determination of molecular structures of other related molecules (Bora et al, 2019;Custódio et al, 2014;Daeyaert et al, 2005;Fu et al, 2018;Kaur and Kadam, 2018;Lucasius and Kateman, 1994;Luke, 1996;Song et al, 2018;Tian et al, 2018;Vitela and Castaños, 2012).…”
Section: The L Backbone Conformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure ɣL[g+g+] is the most stable found along the surface conformation of N-For-L-Cys-NH2 .According to our knowledge, a conformational and electronic study of energetically favored conformations of N-For-L-Cys-NH2diamide at HF/3-21G and B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) (Zamora et al, 2002), shows that the most stable structure (global minimum) of this system adopts the structure ɣL [g+g+].in this work we found the same result with our technical computing AM1/GA-MNC. Results revealed that this techniques is useful for the generation of molecular structures constituting the conformational space of protein and could possibly be extended for the determination of molecular structures of other related molecules (Bora et al, 2019;Custódio et al, 2014;Daeyaert et al, 2005;Fu et al, 2018;Kaur and Kadam, 2018;Lucasius and Kateman, 1994;Luke, 1996;Song et al, 2018;Tian et al, 2018;Vitela and Castaños, 2012).…”
Section: The L Backbone Conformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure ɣL[g+g+] is the most stable found along the surface conformation of N-For-L-Cys-NH2 .According to our knowledge, a conformational and electronic study of energetically favored conformations of N-For-L-Cys-NH2diamide at HF/3-21G and B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) (Zamora et al, 2002), shows that the most stable structure (global minimum) of this system adopts the structure ɣL [g+g+].in this work we found the same result with our technical computing AM1/GA-MNC. Results Table 4: Energies deviations from the global minimum and angles characterizing the minimum ɛL of N-For-L-Cys-NH2, AM1/GA-MNC Backbone [sidechain] ΔΔHf (kcal/mol) φ(°) ψ(°) χ1(°) χ2(°) ɛL [g-g+] 3. revealed that this techniques is useful for the generation of molecular structures constituting the conformational space of protein and could possibly be extended for the determination of molecular structures of other related molecules (Bora et al, 2019;Custódio et al, 2014;Daeyaert et al, 2005;Fu et al, 2018;Kaur and Kadam, 2018;Lucasius and Kateman, 1994;Luke, 1996;Song et al, 2018;Tian et al, 2018;Vitela and Castaños, 2012).…”
Section: The L Backbone Conformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a biological-inspired, populationbased global optimization algorithm. Due to its simple concept, easy implementation, fast convergence, and excellent robustness, it has been more extensively utilized than other mainstream evolutionary algorithms, such as the genetic algorithm (GA) [28,29], the evolutionary strategy (ES) [30,31], and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [32] in recent years. DE is similar to the GA and ES but differs from them because a unique differential evolution operator is referenced in DE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%