1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0362-3319(99)00009-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AIDS and orphans in Uganda: geographical and gender interpretations of household resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, intra-familial fostering arrangements may prove even more central in Thailand than they are in Africa, since Thai informants consistently characterized child-headed households */an important extended family coping strategy in much of Southern and East Africa (Aspaas, 1999;Deguzman, 2001;Foster, 1997;Foster et al ., 1997) */as unviable in their own setting. Thai were equally dismissive of the possibility that significant numbers of orphaned children would be taken in by unrelated families */a practice observed but rarely publically acknowledged in Zimbabwe (Foster et al ., 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, intra-familial fostering arrangements may prove even more central in Thailand than they are in Africa, since Thai informants consistently characterized child-headed households */an important extended family coping strategy in much of Southern and East Africa (Aspaas, 1999;Deguzman, 2001;Foster, 1997;Foster et al ., 1997) */as unviable in their own setting. Thai were equally dismissive of the possibility that significant numbers of orphaned children would be taken in by unrelated families */a practice observed but rarely publically acknowledged in Zimbabwe (Foster et al ., 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the academic literature often draws unquestioningly on these sources and makes similar generalisations. Another type of report focuses on orphanhood in one particular community and is usually based on a single crosssectional study done by a local organization or researcher (for example Aspaas, 1999;Marcus, 1999). Such reports tend to be narrow in their geographical, socio-cultural and historical scope thereby limiting insights into outcomes for specific communities to what can be observed at the present moment.…”
Section: The Availability and Quality Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet there is evidence that children who are paternally orphaned and living in female-headed households (whether their own or a foster family) fare better in certain areas than their peers who are living in male-headed households. A study in Uganda investigating the allocation of household resources to biological children and orphaned children found that in male-headed households biological children were enrolled at a higher rate than school-age orphans in the same household, yet female-headed households in rural areas showed no partiality in the enrollment of children (Aspaas, 1999).…”
Section: Poverty and Aids: An Intimate Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the finding stated that household income was the most important predicting factor as it also affected child health accessibility and receipt of household economic strengthening services. Other studies, including those of Tagurum et al (2015) and Aspaas (1999) found that region of residence influences OVC support services received. They were also stated to influence the range and value of resource options available to orphans and vulnerable households and has implied consequences on access to services for vulnerable populations.…”
Section: Household Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%