2003
DOI: 10.2989/16085906.2003.9626558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the social consequences of orphanhood in South Africa

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It suggests that within Young Lives' sample the short or medium term impact of orphanhood on schooling, health and subjective wellbeing may be overstated. This supports the position of Bray (2003) and Meintjes and Giese (2006), both writing in the context of South Africa that in situations of widespread vulnerability the distinction between orphan and non-orphan is overdrawn. Richter (2008: 7) concurs, arguing that even the term 'AIDS orphan' causes confusion as The UNAIDS definition of an orphan-a child under 18 who has lost one or both parents (UNAIDS et al 2004) does not accord with common-sense meanings in different cultures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It suggests that within Young Lives' sample the short or medium term impact of orphanhood on schooling, health and subjective wellbeing may be overstated. This supports the position of Bray (2003) and Meintjes and Giese (2006), both writing in the context of South Africa that in situations of widespread vulnerability the distinction between orphan and non-orphan is overdrawn. Richter (2008: 7) concurs, arguing that even the term 'AIDS orphan' causes confusion as The UNAIDS definition of an orphan-a child under 18 who has lost one or both parents (UNAIDS et al 2004) does not accord with common-sense meanings in different cultures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…High adult mortality combines with poverty as 39% of the population live below $1.25 per day (HDR 2009). In this setting, deWaal et al 's (2009) call to avoid treating 'Orphans and Vulnerable Children' (OVCs) as a homogenous and exceptional category, and respond to the needs of specific groups and to vulnerability at a societal level has particular salience (see also Bray 2003;Meintjes and Giese 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the HIV/AIDS epidemic may have exacerbated the situation, it is important to note that care for relatives' children by grandparents and other members of the extended family long predates the HIV/AIDS epidemic. As elsewhere, deaths of natural parents due to disease or war have, at various points in history, brought sudden large increases in the orphan population (Bray, 2003;Illife, 2006). Extended families have absorbed and cared for those orphaned in the past (Lund, 2006).…”
Section: Extended Family Care For Orphansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agencies such as UNAIDS point to the rapidly rising numbers of AIDS orphans, and suggest that 'the extended family and the willing community can never fully cope with the numbers' 7 . In this view, the historical division between family and state is breaking down, as the former cannot cope with new demands and pressures (but see Bray, 2003).…”
Section: The Challenge: Unemployment and Poor Health In A Post-agrarimentioning
confidence: 99%