The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
DOI: 10.14393/ufu.di.2017.286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Água residuária de suínos em um sistema agroflorestal: atributos químicos e translocação de nutrientes no solo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this mathematical model, the maximum estimated values of 0.41 and 0.17 cmol c dm -3 were obtained with SWW applications of 51.58 and 52.28 m 3 ha -1 , respectively. A quadratic response for the exchangeable contents of K + and Na + in the soil due to the application of SWW doses has also been observed by Bernardes (2017), as well as by Cabral et al (2011), for the exchangeable contents of K + . In contrast, Condé et al (2013) found no significant response with the application of SWW doses for the exchangeable contents of K + and Na + in the soil.…”
Section: Camentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this mathematical model, the maximum estimated values of 0.41 and 0.17 cmol c dm -3 were obtained with SWW applications of 51.58 and 52.28 m 3 ha -1 , respectively. A quadratic response for the exchangeable contents of K + and Na + in the soil due to the application of SWW doses has also been observed by Bernardes (2017), as well as by Cabral et al (2011), for the exchangeable contents of K + . In contrast, Condé et al (2013) found no significant response with the application of SWW doses for the exchangeable contents of K + and Na + in the soil.…”
Section: Camentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The pH of the soil was not affected by the SWW, but there were significant differences in the means at the evaluated soil depths at 0.01 probability level (Table 3). The response of soil pH to the SWW application is highly variable, because some studies show no changes (CABRAL et al, 2011;CASSOL et al, 2012;BRUNETTO et al, 2012;MAGGI et al, 2013;HOMEM et al, 2014;SILVA et al, 2015;BERNARDES, 2017), some show an increase (SMANHOTTO et al, 2010;LOURENZI et al, 2011;PRIOR et al, 2015;DA ROS et al, 2017) and others show a decrease (VEIGA et al, 2012;OLIVEIRA;PINHEIRO;VEIGA, 2014).…”
Section: Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…por Queiroz et al (2004), que verificaram aumento no teor de alumínio trocável e decréscimo do pH em solos que receberam esterco líquido de suínos. Por outro lado, Cabral et al (2011);Peles (2007) e Bernardes (2017) não observaram variações significativas nos valores de pH do solo para diferentes doses de dejetos líquidos de suínos.…”
Section: Caunclassified
“…Entre os efeitos da associação do sistema plantio direto com o uso agrícola da ARS, destaca-se a possibilidade de aumentar a matéria orgânica (MO) e carbono orgânico (CO) do solo ao longo dos anos (BERNARDES, 2017). A literatura mostra que a adubação com dejetos de animais é mais eficaz no incremento dos teores de CO do que a fertilização mineral (YANG et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified