“…As a result, there is a growing need to explore alternative digestate markets and land recycling, with emphasis on digestate enhancement technologies capable of adding value to the whole digestion process. Transforming digestate into carbonaceous solid and liquid fractions using technologies such as pyrolysis [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) [11][12][13] are now under investigation. The main barriers for industrial uptake of pyrolysis include the requirement for feedstocks to have low moisture content (10% or less) to reduce negative effects of stability, viscosity, pH, and corrosiveness of the pyrolysis liquids [14]; unfavourable energy balances (i.e., high OPEX due to energy consumption for initial feedstock preparation and drying, including high operating temperatures in addition to heat loss and maintenance) [15,16]; controlling the emissions from pyrolysis processes [17]; issues of treatment, upgradability and utilisation of pyrolysis liquids [18,19].…”
Hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) has been identified as a potential route for digestate enhancement producing a solid hydrochar and a process water rich in organic carbon. This study compares the treatment of four dissimilar digestates from anaerobic digestion (AD) of agricultural residue (AGR); sewage sludge (SS); residual municipal solid waste (MSW), and vegetable, garden, and fruit waste (VGF). HTC experiments were performed at 150, 200 and 250 °C for 1 h using 10%, 20%, and 30% solid loadings of a fixed water mass. The effect of temperature and solid loading to the properties of biocoal and biochemical methane potential (BMP) of process waters are investigated. Results show that the behaviour of digestate during HTC is feedstock dependent and the hydrochar produced is a poor-quality solid fuel. The AGR digestate produced the greatest higher heating value (HHV) of 24 MJ/kg, however its biocoal properties are poor due to slagging and fouling propensities. The SS digestate process water produced the highest amount of biogas at 200 °C and 30% solid loading. This study concludes that solely treating digestate via HTC enhances biogas production and that hydrochar be investigated for its use as a soil amender.
“…As a result, there is a growing need to explore alternative digestate markets and land recycling, with emphasis on digestate enhancement technologies capable of adding value to the whole digestion process. Transforming digestate into carbonaceous solid and liquid fractions using technologies such as pyrolysis [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) [11][12][13] are now under investigation. The main barriers for industrial uptake of pyrolysis include the requirement for feedstocks to have low moisture content (10% or less) to reduce negative effects of stability, viscosity, pH, and corrosiveness of the pyrolysis liquids [14]; unfavourable energy balances (i.e., high OPEX due to energy consumption for initial feedstock preparation and drying, including high operating temperatures in addition to heat loss and maintenance) [15,16]; controlling the emissions from pyrolysis processes [17]; issues of treatment, upgradability and utilisation of pyrolysis liquids [18,19].…”
Hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) has been identified as a potential route for digestate enhancement producing a solid hydrochar and a process water rich in organic carbon. This study compares the treatment of four dissimilar digestates from anaerobic digestion (AD) of agricultural residue (AGR); sewage sludge (SS); residual municipal solid waste (MSW), and vegetable, garden, and fruit waste (VGF). HTC experiments were performed at 150, 200 and 250 °C for 1 h using 10%, 20%, and 30% solid loadings of a fixed water mass. The effect of temperature and solid loading to the properties of biocoal and biochemical methane potential (BMP) of process waters are investigated. Results show that the behaviour of digestate during HTC is feedstock dependent and the hydrochar produced is a poor-quality solid fuel. The AGR digestate produced the greatest higher heating value (HHV) of 24 MJ/kg, however its biocoal properties are poor due to slagging and fouling propensities. The SS digestate process water produced the highest amount of biogas at 200 °C and 30% solid loading. This study concludes that solely treating digestate via HTC enhances biogas production and that hydrochar be investigated for its use as a soil amender.
“…Pyrolysis products can produce heat and power, both individually and simultaneously . Char obtained from pyrolysis of ROR has multiple applications, such as for soil improvement, carbon sequestration, and as an adsorbent precursor . The precise distribution of products depends mainly on many various pyrolysis factors such as heating rate, temperature, operating pressure, residence times of the vapors, and the converting biomass/residues and their states of mixing.…”
Section: Challenges For Treatment and Disposal Of Recalcitrant Organimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration of AD and pyrolysis offers further potentially synergistic combinations which include use of digestate as feedstock for pyrolysis, syngas bio‐methanation, or use of chars as an additive in AD to overcome inhibition problems . Besides, for instance, the digestate from AD could be a suitable feedstock for pyrolysis to enhance biochar production, while the remaining char in the digestate could serve as a soil conditioner if the digestate is utilized as composted …”
Section: Pyrolysis Coupled Ad Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochar has a series of applications such as fuel, for some metallurgical processes, as an attractive substitute for coke derived from fossil fuels, since it contains low concentrations of metals. Char is also an excellent fertilizer: It improves soil texture as a soil conditioner, and it retains and slowly releases nutrients and water while acting as upkeep for beneficial organisms . Giwa et al in their research, employed the utilization of biochar in the AD of FW treatment over long‐run operations to enhance reactor performance at high organic loading rate and biogas improvement.…”
Section: Pyrolysis Coupled Ad Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, second‐stage pyrolysis decomposition of the ROR and subsequent oil/tar to syngas can find a route of utilization in AD, thus avoiding direct usage of oil/tar that can pose as toxicants to AD microbes. Integrated or combined proposed routes for FW and associated residues treatment during the past few years are scarcely available, except studies on pyrolysis integrated with AD of only FW, biomass, and sludge treatment . There is still a major knowledge gap in the combination of these two technologies.…”
Food waste (FW) is a severe environmental problem all over the world, and the recalcitrant organic residues (ROR) from FW treatment plant operations are also a critical environmental issue due to unsustainable treatment and disposal techniques.Requirements for FW and ROR complete exploitation with the establishment of recycling-renewable technologies are very crucial. This paper review AD and pyrolysis as two promising technologies to degrade FW and its residues, creating numerous renewable bioenergy yields with value-added. Existing oil/tar application methods in the AD suffered from various problems such as microorganism toxicity and limited productivity. Future upgrading techniques considering the second-stage pyrolysis process to decompose oil/tars for syngas with high hydrogen content and enhanced bio-methanation in the AD were addressed. Simultaneous pyrolysis by-product recycle in the AD during the valorization of FW are aimed to have the features of sustainability toward increased bioenergy production, reactor efficiency, and agricultural application.
K E Y W O R D Sanaerobic digestion, coupling, food waste, pyrolysis, recalcitrant organic residues | 2251 GIWA et Al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.