Agroforestry: An Appropriate and Sustainable Response to a Changing Climate in Southern Africa?

Abstract

Agroforestry is often discussed as a strategy that can be used both for the adaptation to and the mitigation of climate change effects. The climate of southern Africa is predicted to be severely affected by such changes. With agriculture noted as the continent’s largest economic sector, issues such as food security and land degradation are in the forefront. In the light of such concerns we review the current literature to investigate if agroforestry systems (AFS) are a suitable response to the challenges besetting traditional agricultural caused by a changing climate. The benefits bestowed by AFS are multiple, offering ecosystem services, influence over crop production and positive impacts on rural livelihoods through provisioning and income generation. Nevertheless, knowledge gaps remain. We identify outstanding questions requiring further investigation such as the interplay between trees and crops and their combination, with a discussion of potential benefits. Furthermore, we identify deficiencies in the institutional and policy frameworks that underlie the adoption and stimulus of AFS in the southern African region. We uphold the concept that AFS remains an appropriate and sustainable response for an increased resilience against a changing climate in southern Africa for the benefit of livelihoods and multiple environmental values.

On the structural complexity of central European agroforestry systems: a quantitative assessment using terrestrial laser scanning in single-scan mode

“…They may be useful alternatives to agricultural monocultures since they can combine the benefits of agricultural crops with those of trees and are generally known to provide many beneficial functions and services to humans and animals (e.g. Sheppard et al 2020). This may include an increased structural complexity and hence greater habitat diversity for animals in landscapes that are otherwise dominated by agricultural systems (Manning et al 2009).…”

A Scientometric Analysis of Worldwide Intercropping Research Based on Web of Science Database between 1992 and 2020

“…One of the popular topics is to increase "biodiversity" without compromising yield in the intercropping system [65]. The blue-colored cluster is themed with "agroforestry" or "sustainability" [66][67][68][69], while the yellow-colored cluster is featured with "nitrogen", "carbon sequestration", and "microbe biomass" etc. [70][71][72][73].…”

Dynamic Sustainability Assessment Tool: Case Study of Green Biorefineries in Danish Agriculture

“…Numerous researches link agriculture produce to different ecosystem's services and optimize these ecosystem's services [59][60][61][62] instead of considering carrying capacity as a boundary condition and determine maximum animal production as given in this study. Moreover, the recent research by van der Werf et al [63] summarizes current challenges for adequately representing ecosystem services in life cycle assessment methodology.…”