Agroecological crop protection for sustainable agriculture

Deguine, Jean‐Philippe; Aubertot, Jean‐Noël; Bellon, Stéphane; Côté, François; Lauri, Pierre-Eric P.-E.; Lescourret, Françoise; Ratnadass, Alain; Scopel, Éric; Andrieu, Nadine; Bàrberi, Paolo; Becker, Norbert; Bouyer, Jérémy; Brévault, Thierry; Cerdán, Claire; Cortesero, Anne‐Marie; Dangles, Olivier; Delatte, Hélène; Dinh, Phuong; Dreyer, Hans C.; Duru, Michel; Flor, Rica Joy; Gardarin, Antoine; Husson, Olivier; Jacquot, Maxime; Javelle, Aurélie; Justes, Éric; Lam, Mai Thi Xuan; Launay, Marie; Vàng, Lê Văn; Longis, Sandrine; Martı́n, José; Munier‐Jolain, Nicolas; Nguyen, Nga T. T.; Nguyen, Truc Thi Ngoc; Penvern, Servane; Petit, Sandrine; Poisot, Anne-Sophie; Robin, Marie-Hélène; Rolland, Bernard; Rusch, Adrien; Sabourin, Éric; Sanguin, Hervé; Sarthou, Jean-Pierre; Sester, Mathilde; Simon, Sylvaine; Sourisseau, Jean-Michel; Steinberg, Christian; Tchamitchian, Marc; Thoumazeau, Alexis; Tibi, Anaïs; Tivet, Florent; Tixier, Philippe; Trinh, Xuan Thi; Vialatte, Aude; Wyckhuys, Kris A.G.; Lamichhane, Jay Ram

doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2022.11.002

Cited by 46 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 218 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Aujourd'hui, l'agroécologie est reconnue comme un mode de production agricole réaliste et durable en alternative à l'agriculture intensive (FAO, 2019). Dans la PAEC, déclinaison des principes de l'agroécologie à la protection des cultures, la priorité est donnée aux mesures préventives (Deguine et al, 2023). À côté d'autres mesures préventives (arrêt des pesticides, prophylaxie, gestion de la santé du sol, diversification de la végétation), la lutte biologique occupe une place centrale, alors qu'elle n'est ni cohérente ni compatible avec la protection des cultures basée sur l'utilisation de pesticides chimiques.…”

Section: Une Instabilité Terminologique Qui S'internationaliseunclassified

“…contenus de la lutte biologique et du biocontrôle, il pointe certains rapprochements abusifs, sources de malentendus et il propose des distinctions sémantiques et des clarifications techniques, qui sont essentielles à avoir en tête, ce que soulignent Stenberg et al (2021). La Protection agroécologique des cultures (PAEC), qui privilégie la reconception du système de culture et les techniques de prévention des risques dus aux bioagresseurs, est proposée comme une réponse réaliste aux enjeux de durabilité écologique des agroécosystèmes et de protection des cultures (Deguine et al, 2023). La lutte biologique par conservation y occupe une place centrale, car elle relève d'une approche systémique et préventive.…”

Section: Approche Prévenɵve De Protecɵon Des Culturesunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lutte biologique et biocontrôle : un besoin de clarification

Deguine

2023

Cah. Agric.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La lutte biologique et le biocontrôle sont des concepts de protection des cultures qui ont des points communs mais qui ont également leurs spécificités. La première est connue depuis les années 1880, alors que le second est apparu dans les années 2010 dans le paysage français. Depuis quelques années, on constate régulièrement une confusion dans les termes et dans les interprétations de ces concepts qui ne sont pas de même nature : la lutte biologique est définie par des stratégies et le biocontrôle par des produits. Ce papier vise donc à répondre à un besoin de clarification : il contribue à distinguer les périmètres et les contenus de ces concepts, à pointer certains rapprochements abusifs et à proposer des clarifications sémantiques. Il passe en revue les termes anglophones et francophones relatifs à la lutte biologique et au biocontrôle à l’échelle européenne. Le papier discute enfin du rôle et de la pertinence des deux concepts dans la protection agroécologique des cultures. La lutte biologique par conservation y occupe une place centrale, car elle relève d’une approche systémique et préventive des risques liés aux bioagresseurs des cultures. Si certains produits de biocontrôle sont prometteurs pour la prévention des risques liés aux bioagresseurs, beaucoup d’autres s’inscrivent dans une démarche curative, similaire à celle de l’utilisation des pesticides chimiques de synthèse, avec les mêmes types de retombées commerciales pour l’agro-industrie.

show abstract

Section: Une Instabilité Terminologique Qui S'internationaliseunclassified

Section: Approche Prévenɵve De Protecɵon Des Culturesunclassified

Lutte biologique et biocontrôle : un besoin de clarification

Deguine

2023

Cah. Agric.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We highlighted that: (i) agroecological crop protection practices (Deguine et al, 2023) generally resulted in a reduction in the risks of viral zoonoses, unlike conventional, agrochemical-based practices which tend to increase risks (Ratnadass and Deguine, 2021); (ii) substitution or biocontrol practices resulted in fewer health risks from infectious bacterial and parasitic diseases (Ratnadass and Deberdt, 2021;Ratnadass and Martin, 2022); (iii) conventional practices or those seeking to increase efficiency generally gave rise to an increased disease risk, whether viral, bacterial or parasitic (Ratnadass and Deguine, 2021;Ratnadass and Deberdt, 2021;Ratnadass and Martin, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crop protection practices and risks associated with human fungal infectious diseases: a One Health perspective

Ratnadass

Sester

2023

Cah. Agric.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We review interactions between crop protection practices (developed to control plant pathogens and invertebrate pests) and human fungal infectious diseases. Unlike viral, bacterial and parasitic infections, fungal infections in humans are usually only superficial in healthy individuals, but can become invasive and pose serious risks to immunosuppressed individuals. Although their global impact is less than that of other infectious diseases, human fungal infections still pose serious public health issues. For instance, the use of synthetic agricultural fungicides, particularly the azole class, under conventional intensive, or efficiency improvement-based crop protection practices, is at risk as far as antimicrobial resistance is concerned, due to cases of cross-resistance to clinical azoles used to treat pulmonary aspergillosis, candidiasis and cryptococcocis. In this respect, the One Health approach, originally designed for other types of human pathogens, looks relevant for human pathogenic fungi. Additionally, some entomopathogenic fungi used as biocontrol products against crop pests in a substitution-based approach, may be potentially pathogenic to humans. Very few examples of redesign-based practices (i.e. Agroecological Crop Protection) emerged from our analysis on human fungal diseases. However, discontinuing agricultural azole fungicides (as practiced on organic farms, and which may to some extent be related to the redesign strategy) appears to be the best way to reduce selection pressure and hence the level of azole-resistant human pathogenic fungal strains in the environment.

show abstract

“…

…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Around the world, sustainable agriculture efforts are underway to find a balance between preserving the environment and ensuring food security. To address this, a shift towards environmentally friendly methods is underway in sustainable agriculture, using innovative strategies that reduce exposure to pesticides and their negative impacts (Deguine et al, 2023). A new generation of bioproducts is being developed, using volatile compounds from plants and microorganisms.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial: Advances of novel bioproducts for sustainable agriculture

López

Pascual‐Villalobos²,

Schoebitz³

et al. 2023

Front. Agron.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Protection against pests, pathogens, and weeds is crucial for agroecosystem management to prevent significant crop losses (Oerke, 2006). Chemical pesticides, widely used since the 1960s, have led to numerous negative impacts, including harm to human health and changes to biodiversity (Deguine et al., 2023). Around the world, sustainable agriculture efforts are underway to find a balance between preserving the environment and ensuring food security. To address this, a shift towards environmentally friendly methods is underway in sustainable agriculture, using innovative strategies that reduce exposure to pesticides and their negative impacts (Deguine et al., 2023). A new generation of bioproducts is being developed, using volatile compounds from plants and microorganisms. In this sense, the latest advancements in agriculture include bioproducts derived from bacteria and fungi, products utilizing monoterpenes and other volatile compounds to safeguard crops from pests and diseases, and bioproducts to boost crop yield along with carrier materials that offer stability, protection, and control.Consequently, this Research Topic focuses on developing new formulations of ecofriendly biopesticides, studying soil microorganisms and plant-derived bioactive compounds, and exploring new techniques for bioproduct development.A publication titled "Effect of Neo-Boost Pesticide on Mortality and Development of Tetranychus urticae" is presented by Bruinsma et al. The authors show the need for additional pesticides with different modes of action. The study recommends field doses depending on the developmental stages of T. urticae. Neo-Boost has high efficiency against larvae, moderate efficiency against adults, and no effect on eggs of T. urticae. The study also shows that Neo-Boost could enhance plant defenses against mites and has the potential to be used as a novel acaricide or combined with other ingredients for more potent mite control. They demonstrate the efficacy of Neo-Boost, which could be used in its current formulation or combined with other active ingredients.On the other hand, Loṕez et al. review the use of essential oils and derivatives as biopesticides in "New insights into biopesticides: solid and liquid formulations of essential Frontiers in Agronomy frontiersin.org 01

show abstract

Agroecological crop protection for sustainable agriculture

Cited by 46 publications

References 218 publications

Lutte biologique et biocontrôle : un besoin de clarification

Lutte biologique et biocontrôle : un besoin de clarification

Crop protection practices and risks associated with human fungal infectious diseases: a One Health perspective

Editorial: Advances of novel bioproducts for sustainable agriculture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About