Agricultural trade liberalization, multifunctionality, and sugar in the south Florida landscape

Hollander, Gail M.

doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.11.004

Cited by 78 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The result of this is that boundaries within frames may be firmer than boundaries between frames. Such distinctions resonate with writings that identify weaker and stronger variants of both alternative food networks (Watts et al, 2005) and multifunctionality (Hollander, 2004), as critiques of neoliberalism. In Mooney and Hunt's work, flat and sharp keys signify tendencies rather than essences to reflect social and political mobilisation.…”

Section: Consensus Framing and Collective Action Framesmentioning

confidence: 64%

Food security framings within the UK and the integration of local food systems

Kirwan

Maye

2013

Journal of Rural Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DisclaimerThe University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights.The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT.This is a peer-reviewed, pre-print version of the following published document: DisclaimerThe University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights.The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement.PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT. Note: This is a pre-publication copy of the paper which was submitted and published in Journal of Rural Studies (2013, Vol 29, pp. 91-100) 2 Food security framings within the UK and the integration of local food systems AbstractThis paper provides a critical interpretation of food security politics in the UK. It applies the notion of food security collective action frames to assess how specific action frames are maintained and contested. The interdependency between scale and framing in food security discourse is also scrutinised. It does this through an examination of 'official' UK food security approaches and the place of local food systems within these debates. The paper shows how the UK government's approach to food production and food security has been underpinned by the notion of resilience, which it considers is best achieved through sustainable intensification, market liberalisation and risk management, with local food systems largely sidelined within these 'official' framings. Nevertheless, collective action frames are socio-political constructs which are open to contestation; they are not static entities and are part of a mobile multiorganizational political field. The notion of incompleteness and fragility is highly pertinent to ...

show abstract

Section: Consensus Framing and Collective Action Framesmentioning

confidence: 64%

Food security framings within the UK and the integration of local food systems

Kirwan

Maye

2013

Journal of Rural Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a hegemonic political discourse, neoliberalism is seen as shaping the opportunities made available to reformulate agriculture. Models popular in Europe, and growingly so in the US, such as "multifunctionality," and locally based initiatives such as right-to-farm laws, agricultural zoning, farm-to-school programs, and purchase of development rights programs are explored for their potential to curtail the negative impacts of neoliberalism in agriculture [44][45][46][47]. US researchers such as Patricia Allen, Julie Guthman [48,49], and Jill Harrison [50] have illustrated how these models can become heavily constrained by the neoliberal doctrines of "free trade", individual responsibility, consumerism, and the utilization of market mechanisms to determine agricultural policy implementation.…”

Section: Protectionism In a Neoliberal World?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sociology in Global Environmental Governance? Neoliberalism, Protectionism and the Methyl Bromide Controversy in the Montreal Protocol

Gareau

2017

Environments

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sociological studies of global agriculture need to pay close attention to the protectionist aspects of neoliberalism at the global scale of environmental governance. With agri-food studies in the social sciences broadening interrogations of the impact of neoliberalism on agri-food systems and their alternatives, investigating global environmental governance (GEG) will help reveal its impacts on the global environment, global science/knowledge, and the potential emergence of ecologically sensible alternatives. It is argued here that as agri-food studies of neoliberalism sharpen the focus on these dimensions the widespread consequences of protectionism of US agri-industry in GEG will become better understood, and the solutions more readily identifiable. This paper illustrates how the delayed phase out of the toxic substance methyl bromide in the Montreal Protocol exemplifies the degree to which the US agri-industry may be protected at the global scale of environmental governance, thus prolonging the transition to ozone-friendly alternatives. Additionally, it is clear that protectionism has had a significant impact on the dissemination and interpretation of science/knowledge of methyl bromide and its alternatives. Revealing the role that protectionism plays more broadly in the agriculture/environmental governance interface, and its oftentimes negative impacts on science and potential alternatives, can shed light on how protectionism can be made to serve ends that are at odds with environmental protection.

show abstract

“…SZP definovala evropský model zemědělství, který je založen na konceptu multifunkčního zemědělství. Tento přístup vznikl v období 90. let minulého století a je spojen především s vyjednáváním liberalizace zemědělského obchodu, jako podpora širších cílů zařazených do zelené obálky negociací WTO (Hollander, 2004). Tento přístup primárně nepodporuje produkci zemědělských komodit a neohrožuje tedy obchod se zemědělskými komoditami (Hollander, 2004).…”

unclassified

“…Tento přístup vznikl v období 90. let minulého století a je spojen především s vyjednáváním liberalizace zemědělského obchodu, jako podpora širších cílů zařazených do zelené obálky negociací WTO (Hollander, 2004). Tento přístup primárně nepodporuje produkci zemědělských komodit a neohrožuje tedy obchod se zemědělskými komoditami (Hollander, 2004). EU přistoupila k multifunkčnosti s odůvodněním, že platby zemědělcům již nebudou přímými dotacemi zemědělské produkce, ale podporou řady neprodukčních statků a služeb nebo příspěvkem k plnění širších cílů jako je potravinová bezpečnost a rozvoj venkova (McCarthy, 2005).…”

unclassified

“…EU přistoupila k multifunkčnosti s odůvodněním, že platby zemědělcům již nebudou přímými dotacemi zemědělské produkce, ale podporou řady neprodukčních statků a služeb nebo příspěvkem k plnění širších cílů jako je potravinová bezpečnost a rozvoj venkova (McCarthy, 2005). Zároveň bylo argumentováno jedinečností evropské krajiny, která se spoluvytvářela po tisíciletí a její "údržba" tedy vyžaduje podporu (Hollander, 2004).…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multifunctionality of Czech Agriculture and Rural Development: Current Situation and Prospects for the Future

Hrabák¹

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Agricultural trade liberalization, multifunctionality, and sugar in the south Florida landscape

Cited by 78 publications

References 14 publications

Food security framings within the UK and the integration of local food systems

Food security framings within the UK and the integration of local food systems

Sociology in Global Environmental Governance? Neoliberalism, Protectionism and the Methyl Bromide Controversy in the Montreal Protocol

Multifunctionality of Czech Agriculture and Rural Development: Current Situation and Prospects for the Future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About