Agricultural Policy, Migration, and Malaria in the 1930s United States

Abstract

The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) caused a population shift in the United States in the 1930s. Evaluating the effects of the AAA on the incidence of malaria can therefore offer important lessons regarding the broader consequences of demographic changes. Using a quasi-first difference model and a robust set of controls, we find a negative association between AAA expenditures and malaria death rates at the county level. Further, we find the AAA caused relatively low-income groups to migrate from counties with high-risk malaria ecologies. These results suggest that the AAA-induced migration played an important role in the reduction of malaria.

Adapting to Climate Change: The Remarkable Decline in the U.S. Temperature-Mortality Relationship over the 20th Century

“…Malaria was mostly confined to the South by 1920 (Maxcy 1923). Also, the South had nearly eradicated malaria by 1940 (Barreca et al 2012). The fact that we observe a dampening of the temperature-mortality relationship both: a) outside the South, and b) after 1940, suggests that malaria's eradication cannot account for the majority of our estimates.…”

How Successful Was the New Deal? The Microeconomic Impact of New Deal Spending and Lending Policies in the 1930s

“…This push of the croppers and tenants down the tenure ladder and out of farming had a variety of effects, some positive and some mixed. A number migrated out of areas where malaria was a problem with a consequent reduction in the overall malaria rate in the South (Barreca, Fishback, and Kantor 2012). The average wages of hired workers rose about 9 percent with the introduction of the AAA, but this may have been because the average quality of the hired workers increased as the tenants and croppers were pushed down the tenure ladder into wage jobs (Fishback, Haines and Rhode 2012).…”

Racial Differences in Health in Long-Run Perspective: A Brief Introduction

“…Therefore, migration from rural areas to southern cities and particularly to the North contributed to declines in malaria rates. Barreca, Fishback and Kantor (2012) sewerage. Yet, despite reductions in the urban health penalty in the early twentieth century, it is not clear that moving to a city generated a net improvement in health.…”