2016
DOI: 10.1080/1389224x.2016.1227044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural extension in Latin America: current dynamics of pluralistic advisory systems in heterogeneous contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the limited role of the secondary cooperative in enabling good governance and dispute resolution presents a missed opportunity. It is difficult to service the heterogeneity of farmers (smallholder, emergent and large commercial farmers) using a single extension approach, hence building state service delivery support might require a balance between current diffusionist approaches and the adoption of more flexible and demand-driven pluralistic territorial approaches (Yang, Klerkx, and Leeuwis 2014;Klerkx, Landini, and Santoyo-Cortés 2016). Multi-actor and inter-institutional approaches that effectively connect institutions and actors at the local level to higher level institutions have enjoyed a degree of success in Latin America (Klerkx, Landini, and Santoyo-Cortés 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the limited role of the secondary cooperative in enabling good governance and dispute resolution presents a missed opportunity. It is difficult to service the heterogeneity of farmers (smallholder, emergent and large commercial farmers) using a single extension approach, hence building state service delivery support might require a balance between current diffusionist approaches and the adoption of more flexible and demand-driven pluralistic territorial approaches (Yang, Klerkx, and Leeuwis 2014;Klerkx, Landini, and Santoyo-Cortés 2016). Multi-actor and inter-institutional approaches that effectively connect institutions and actors at the local level to higher level institutions have enjoyed a degree of success in Latin America (Klerkx, Landini, and Santoyo-Cortés 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to service the heterogeneity of farmers (smallholder, emergent and large commercial farmers) using a single extension approach, hence building state service delivery support might require a balance between current diffusionist approaches and the adoption of more flexible and demand-driven pluralistic territorial approaches (Yang, Klerkx, and Leeuwis 2014;Klerkx, Landini, and Santoyo-Cortés 2016). Multi-actor and inter-institutional approaches that effectively connect institutions and actors at the local level to higher level institutions have enjoyed a degree of success in Latin America (Klerkx, Landini, and Santoyo-Cortés 2016). Strengthening extension capacity and the role of secondary cooperatives would help to minimise the current focus in cooperatives on electing leaders who are politically connected and thus not only help to level the playing field between cooperatives in terms of the programmes they access but also minimise the possibility of connected leaders being less accountable to their membership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviving Latin American extension systems has been back on the policy agenda the past decade or so (Klerkx, Landini, and Santoyo-Cortés 2016), indicating a reversal of decades of neglect following the neoliberal wave of fiscal and economic crises that led to the removal of public funding for extension services in many countries in the region. This renewed attention in the region has led to several reforms of their extension systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submissions come from all over the world, though some regions remain underrepresented. This has for example been noted for Latin America, which led to a special issue- (Klerkx et al, 2016).…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 76%