Agricultural Enterprise Restructuring in Russia, 1991–95: A Technical Efficiency Analysis

Sedik, David; Trueblood, Michael A.; Arnade, Carlos

doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4531-6_22

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite some of the earliest studies being on Canada (Giannakas, Schoney, and Tzouvelekas 2001) and the United States (Lachaal 1994), there are only four more studies on the United States (Lambert and Bayda 2005;Serra, Zilberman, and Gil 2008;Chidmi, Solis, and Cabrera 2011;Zaeske 2012). In Europe, one publication has focused on Switzerland (Ferjani 2008), two on Norway (Kumbhakar and Lien 2010; Kumbhakar, Lien, and Hardaker 2014) and two on Russia (Sotnikov 1998;Sedik, Trueblood, and Arnade 2000). The EU appears to be largely covered but it is not covered in terms of the variety of authors.…”

Section: Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results

Minviel¹,

Latruffe²

2016

Applied Economics

160

134

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigating the impact of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency is becoming a critical issue in applied agricultural policy analysis. This article presents a meta-analysis of empirical results on this issue, based on data gathered from a systematic literature review. We find that, in the empirical literature, subsidies are commonly negatively associated with farm technical efficiency. Meta-regression estimation results show that the direction (significantly negative, significantly positive or non-significant) of the observed effects is sensitive to the way subsidies are modelled in the empirical studies.

show abstract

Section: Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results

Minviel¹,

Latruffe²

2016

Applied Economics

160

134

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to achieve this goal, several directions of the reforms have been recommended. Several categorizations of the directions are possible, including the following one by World Bank analysts (World Bank, 1994;Csaki and Lerman, 1997;Sedik, Truebold, and Amade, 1999): Only the recommendation on land reform is specific to agriculture. The other two domains of reform relate to the general economy and focus on "upstream " and "downstream" areas of the agricultural sector.…”

Section: Purpose and Scope Of Economic Reforms In Agriculturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These changes have resulted in inadequate input applications and contributed to declining output levels (Pogozheva and Chenard, 1997;Sedik, Truebold, and Amade, 1999) and farm incomes (Kakwani, 1996). Decreased farm income in the presence of high nominal interest rates, in turn, contributed to reduced farm investment.…”

Section: Worsening Agricultural Terms Of Tradementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data have been limited, especially at the farm level, and the work on productivity and efficiency in agriculture was first done using country level data (Koopman, 1989;Carter and Zhang, 1994), and regional within-coimtry aggregates (Boyd, 1987(Boyd, , 1988Brada and King, 1993;Payne, 1993, 1995;Sotnikov, 1998;Sedik, Truebold, and Amade, 1999). Recent studies exist that use farm-level data to study production efficiency.…”

Section: Efficiency Of Agricuitural Production In Formerly Planned Ecmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The efficiency was positively related to the levels of technical education and experience of farm workers, the degree of management autonomy, and the amount of Russian technical assistance. Sedik, Truebold, and Amade (1999) More precipitation led to more efficiency, higher temperatures led to less efficiency.…”

Section: Studies Comparing Private and Collectivist Agriculturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Three essays on productivity in post-Soviet primary agriculture

Kurkalova

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overiaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerognaphically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9' black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directiy to order.

show abstract

A Comparison of Agrarian Transition in Russia, China, and Eastern Europe1

Macours¹,

Swinnen²

2000

Russia’s Agro-Food Sector

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agricultural Enterprise Restructuring in Russia, 1991–95: A Technical Efficiency Analysis

Cited by 5 publications

References 17 publications

Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results

Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results

Three essays on productivity in post-Soviet primary agriculture

A Comparison of Agrarian Transition in Russia, China, and Eastern Europe1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About