1995
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199503)51:2<153::aid-jclp2270510203>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between patient self-report and clinician rating: Concurrence between the bsi and the gap among psychiatric inpatients

Abstract: Two rating scales were compared for 200 adult psychiatric inpatients at admission to, and discharge from, the hospital. Patients rated their own psychological symptoms on the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and clinicians rated patientS' psychological, social, and occupational functioning on the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale. Analyses indicated no significant relationships between symptom distress reported by patients and global functioning rated by clinicians. These findings support previous res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with several other studies (Dufton & Siddique, 1992;Piersma & Boes, 1995;Sullivan & Grubea, 1991), we found only minimal associations between patients' self-rated symptoms and clinicians' ratings of patients' current and highest level of functioning. This finding raises further questions about the determinants and value of GAF ratings, especially given that patients' self-rated symptoms at baseline predict one-year symptom and functioning outcomes much better than do clinicians' ratings of patients' global impairment.…”
Section: Determinants Of Gaf Ratingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with several other studies (Dufton & Siddique, 1992;Piersma & Boes, 1995;Sullivan & Grubea, 1991), we found only minimal associations between patients' self-rated symptoms and clinicians' ratings of patients' current and highest level of functioning. This finding raises further questions about the determinants and value of GAF ratings, especially given that patients' self-rated symptoms at baseline predict one-year symptom and functioning outcomes much better than do clinicians' ratings of patients' global impairment.…”
Section: Determinants Of Gaf Ratingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Il est également possible de calculer un indice de sévérité de l'ensemble des symptômes (General Severity Index) en établissant la somme des intensités rapportées, laquelle est ensuite divisée par le nombre total des symptômes (53 énoncés). Les coefficients de cohérence interne sont satisfaisants et varient selon les échelles de .71 à .85 (Piersma et Boes, 1995).…”
Section: The Turner Battery Questionnaireunclassified
“…For example, Muller and Moller (17) found that physicians rated the onset of improvement as occurring 4 days earlier than patients reported. Others (18) found no relation between self-reported symptom distress and clinician ratings among inpatients. Still others have found self-report ratings to be more accurate predictors of behavior than clinician-assessed ratings (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%