2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreeing to Disagree: Choosing Among Eight Topic-Modeling Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through this approach, it is possible to understand what topics the keywords are composed of, the importance between keywords, and similar characteristics [ 24 , 25 ]. Since topic modeling has the advantage of considering and identifying all of the multiple topics included in a single document, it has recently become more widely used in studies related to the fields of management, policy, and industry [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through this approach, it is possible to understand what topics the keywords are composed of, the importance between keywords, and similar characteristics [ 24 , 25 ]. Since topic modeling has the advantage of considering and identifying all of the multiple topics included in a single document, it has recently become more widely used in studies related to the fields of management, policy, and industry [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topic consistency can be used to measure whether words within a topic are coherent, i.e., if a group of terms are consistent with each other, then these terms are coherent. For a specific topic, the semantic similarity between words in the topic determines the degree of coherence of the topic, so topic consistency can be measured by the semantic similarity between words in the topic [52][53][54][55]. The greater the consistency value of the topic is, the more coherent the words of each topic will be.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, conference papers comprised 53.2% (903) and articles comprised 40.1% (680). This is relevant because TM academic literature is positioned more in conference proceedings than in papers and only 2.06% (35) were reviews. All the variables from Scopus and WoS were included in this study; thus, the data analysis was sufficiently rigorous to understand the main contributions of TM.…”
Section: Metodology a Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%