Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2482991.2483005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agora2.0

Abstract: Providing a common place for the civil society to gather and discuss topics of mutual interest is a growing challenge for social and collaborative computing. Web-based tools for civic engagement, while promising, are still disconnected from meaningful physical locations where citizens usually meet and might limit the involvement of a considerable portion of the citizen population. We propose a system, Agora2.0, designed to recover the useful function that public places have had in the past in promoting and reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its subtle forms, the view inspires people to design technologies to solve societal problems such as sustainability (Hanks, Odom, Roedl, & Blevis, 2008) and war (Hourcade & Bullock-Rest, 2011). In civic computing, the view manifests in research on the promotion of civic participation, such as designing interactive public displays to encourage civic discussions (Schiavo et al, 2013;Valkanova et al, 2014).…”
Section: Rejecting the Means/end Dichotomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its subtle forms, the view inspires people to design technologies to solve societal problems such as sustainability (Hanks, Odom, Roedl, & Blevis, 2008) and war (Hourcade & Bullock-Rest, 2011). In civic computing, the view manifests in research on the promotion of civic participation, such as designing interactive public displays to encourage civic discussions (Schiavo et al, 2013;Valkanova et al, 2014).…”
Section: Rejecting the Means/end Dichotomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, public polling displays (PPDs) have been used to offer citizens interactive questionnaires in public space to gather feedback on locally relevant topics [53,59], which can be framed by visualizing dynamic information that is relevant for that questionnaire [5,12]. Empirical evidence shows that citizens seem to respond in truthful ways [15,61], even when taking into account eventual faulty entries that are created by situational circumstances such as playing children [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%