2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10329-020-00878-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agonistic vocalization behaviour in the male ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta)

Abstract: Vocalizations are used by group-living animals as aggressive and submissive signals during agonistic interactions, and are also used to maintain dominance hierarchies in many species. For gregarious strepsirrhines with large vocal repertoires and differentiated dominance ranks like the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta), agonistic vocalization use is important to study to better understand their social adaptations.To determine whether ring-tailed lemur vocalizations such as the yip, cackle, twitter, chutter, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(152 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This species' visual and acoustic repertoire includes several submissive postures (Pereira & Kappeler, 1997) and vocalisations (Macedonia, 1993). Interestingly, vocal signals are elicited in context dependent agonistic interactions, with yips, cackles and twitters given by submissive individuals when losing agonistic interactions, and chutters elicited by both winners and losers (Bolt, 2021), supporting the existence of intricate signalling systems to mitigate conflict.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This species' visual and acoustic repertoire includes several submissive postures (Pereira & Kappeler, 1997) and vocalisations (Macedonia, 1993). Interestingly, vocal signals are elicited in context dependent agonistic interactions, with yips, cackles and twitters given by submissive individuals when losing agonistic interactions, and chutters elicited by both winners and losers (Bolt, 2021), supporting the existence of intricate signalling systems to mitigate conflict.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Female aggression toward males included bite, chase, cuff, nose poke, and lunge (Gould, 1994; Jolly, 1966; Pereira & Kappeler, 1997; Taylor, 1986). Nonaggressive agonism in this study included all instances of (1) approach–withdraw interactions between females and males (including displacements, wherein a dominant individual takes the physical space vacated by a subordinate) and (2) spontaneous submissive vocalizations (e.g., “yip”: Bolt, 2021; Jolly, 1966; Macedonia, 1993) made by males to females. Because some female approaches led to affiliative behavior with males (i.e., were followed by grooming between individuals), only those approaches that elicited a submissive response (submissive vocalizations and/or withdraws) from the individual being approached were scored as agonistic interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%