2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65589-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agonist-induced phosphorylation bar code and differential post-activation signaling of the delta opioid receptor revealed by phosphosite-specific antibodies

Abstract: the δ-opioid receptor (Dop) is an attractive pharmacological target due to its potent analgesic, anxiolytic and anti-depressant activity in chronic pain models. However, some but not all selective DOP agonists also produce severe adverse effects such as seizures. Thus, the development of novel agonists requires a profound understanding of their effects on DOP phosphorylation, post-activation signaling and dephosphorylation. Here we show that agonist-induced Dop phosphorylation at threonine 361 (T361) and serin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, ligand-dependent changes in these regions have been shown to lead to bias sampling of distinct arrestin conformations with different impacts on downstream signaling events. In particular, ligand-specific phosphorylation patterns of GPCRs, so-called 'phosphorylation barcodes', caused by selective recruitment of various GRKs that target different sets of phosphorylation sites, have been reported to favor certain arrestin conformations [164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175]. These phosphorylation-dependent structural alterations were initially demonstrated by using intramolecular bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) (reviewed in Refs [137,176]) and FRET biosensors of arrestins in whole cells [157,164,177].…”
Section: Conformational Dynamics Of Gpcrtransducer Signaling Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, ligand-dependent changes in these regions have been shown to lead to bias sampling of distinct arrestin conformations with different impacts on downstream signaling events. In particular, ligand-specific phosphorylation patterns of GPCRs, so-called 'phosphorylation barcodes', caused by selective recruitment of various GRKs that target different sets of phosphorylation sites, have been reported to favor certain arrestin conformations [164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175]. These phosphorylation-dependent structural alterations were initially demonstrated by using intramolecular bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) (reviewed in Refs [137,176]) and FRET biosensors of arrestins in whole cells [157,164,177].…”
Section: Conformational Dynamics Of Gpcrtransducer Signaling Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of these, Thr358 and Ser363 are targeted by GRK2, with Ser363 being the primary site [ 123 , 124 , 125 ]. Phosphorylation of Thr361 after Ser363 by GRK2/3 has also been observed [ 126 ]. Strong DOR agonists such as DPDPE and DADLE (enkephalin analogues) induced robust DOR phosphorylation at both Ser363 and Thr361 and receptor internalization, whereas agonists that only caused Ser363 to be phosphorylated induced weak internalization [ 126 ].…”
Section: The Order Of Phosphorylation: Sequential and Hierarchicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorylation of Thr361 after Ser363 by GRK2/3 has also been observed [ 126 ]. Strong DOR agonists such as DPDPE and DADLE (enkephalin analogues) induced robust DOR phosphorylation at both Ser363 and Thr361 and receptor internalization, whereas agonists that only caused Ser363 to be phosphorylated induced weak internalization [ 126 ]. KOR has only four potential C-terminal phosphorylation sites, and phosphorylation of one, Ser369 (in mouse KOR), by GRK3 is associated with arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization [ 127 , 128 ].…”
Section: The Order Of Phosphorylation: Sequential and Hierarchicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ubiquitous expression of GRK2, 3, 5, and 6 obscures the elucidation of the roles of individual GRKs on receptor phosphorylation. Until now, siRNA/shRNA [16][17][18] , or CRISPR/Cas 9 approaches targeting only a certain subset of relevant GRKs 19 , and the utilisation of GRK inhibitors were the only strategies used to study their impact on living cell function. Yet, in combination with phosphosite-specific antibodies 20,21 or mass-spectrometry 22 , contributions of individual GRKs to the phosphorylation of certain receptors were elucidated to some degree 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%