2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0197-4580(03)00118-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: replicability of regional differences in volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

67
507
5
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 626 publications
(592 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
67
507
5
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to what has been reported in some previous studies (Lim et al, 1990, Convit et al, 1995, De Leon et al, 1997, Jernigan et al, 2001, Scahill et al, 2003, Raz et al, 2004a, Raz et al, 2004b, Du et al, 2006. However, after normalization the relationships were no longer significant.…”
Section: Volumetric Losssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to what has been reported in some previous studies (Lim et al, 1990, Convit et al, 1995, De Leon et al, 1997, Jernigan et al, 2001, Scahill et al, 2003, Raz et al, 2004a, Raz et al, 2004b, Du et al, 2006. However, after normalization the relationships were no longer significant.…”
Section: Volumetric Losssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, these findings in healthy subjects have been inconsistent. Some studies revealed that age was not significantly related to the volume reduction of the hippocampus (Sullivan et al, 1995, Sullivan et al, 2005; others obtained the opposite results (Lim et al, 1990, Convit et al, 1995, De Leon et al, 1997, Jernigan et al, 2001, Scahill et al, 2003, Raz et al, 2004a, Raz et al, 2004b, Du et al, 2006. The discrepancies in the results of these reports might be due to differences in the segmentation of anatomical regions, or in the age range of the subjects studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when examining the sample split by gender, the negative association only remained for the women. Although the propensity of the literature supports similar age‐related hippocampal volume loss for men and women (Jack et al., 2015; Mu, Xie, Wen, Weng, & Shuyun, 1999; Raz et al., 2004, 2005), there are reports of both women‐ and men‐specific age–hippocampal volume relationships (Murphy et al.,1996; Pruessner et al., 2001). For the current sample, the lack of significant association in the men may be explained by this gender not experiencing a similar age‐related trajectory in hippocampal volume, and therefore not experiencing the benefits of CRF on hippocampal volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other reports, which can vary by technique, number of subjects, screening criterion, age range, or proportion of older participants, have described global decreases of WM volume with age in both sexes (Guttmann et al 1998;Courchesne et al 2000;Ge et al 2002;Allen et al 2005). Cross-sectional studies also show a loss of WM volume with age in specific regions of the brain, which occurs in both men and women (Raz et al 1997;Bartzokis et al 2001;Jernigan et al 2001;Raz et al 2004;Allen et al 2005;Walhovd et al 2005). A loss of WM volume, which is paralleled by GM loss, is even detectable across a two decade range in otherwise healthy elderly (Lemaitre et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%