Ageing and Digital Technology 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging in the Digital Age: Conceptualizing Technology Adoption and Digital Inequalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
55
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
55
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, end users have different thresholds for acceptance of innovation and can be grouped into five archetypes: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards 6 . In addition, aging adults, considered amongst the most digitally divided demographic group 7 , present unique challenges and dedicated efforts exist to develop strategies for implementation [7][8][9][10] . Conversely, challenges exist for healthcare innovators to best demonstrate solution impacts and to ensure compliance with standards, these include: unclear end-user expectations; uncertainty of evidence generation approaches; and, keeping up to date with the evolving compliance landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, end users have different thresholds for acceptance of innovation and can be grouped into five archetypes: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards 6 . In addition, aging adults, considered amongst the most digitally divided demographic group 7 , present unique challenges and dedicated efforts exist to develop strategies for implementation [7][8][9][10] . Conversely, challenges exist for healthcare innovators to best demonstrate solution impacts and to ensure compliance with standards, these include: unclear end-user expectations; uncertainty of evidence generation approaches; and, keeping up to date with the evolving compliance landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there exists a substantial age-related gap with respect to mobile device experience and proficiency [9]. In the U.S., only 53% of adults aged 65+ own a smartphone, compared to 96% of adults aged 18-29 [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, smartphone rehabilitation apps were shown to be promising for delivering therapeutic treatment to (older) patients, improving not only their health conditions but also other aspects of quality of life [20]. While technology proficiency benefits all, the benefits to older adults may be especially great [9], [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main categories of the findings All things considered, I basically agree with previous research in that both the structures framing seniors' lives, as well as their agency, interplay in their particular contexts of technology use and rejection(Neves and Mead, 2018;Quan-Haase et al, 2016). As the literature has repeatedly stated, older adults are a very heterogenous group and some embrace technology while others avoid it(Francis et al, 2019; see also…”
supporting
confidence: 83%