2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

213
1,321
26
24

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,550 publications
(1,584 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
213
1,321
26
24
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this association among negative self-assessments, personality, and stronger engagement of these brain networks is interesting in light of the considerable research showing that younger adults tend to have more negative affect than older adults (e.g., Carstensen, et al, 2011;Stone, et al, 2010), and our finding that older adults have weaker activation and functional connectivity in the DN. That is, if older adults modulate their emotional responses to be more positive, in line with their motivational goals Mather & Carstensen, 2005), and activity in the DN is associated with cognitive processes leading to greater negativity, then reduced DN engagement and/or functional connectivity during social cognitive tasks may be a reflection of these goals. It should be noted, however that these interpretations of the relation between DN activity and self-relevant judgments are tentative, given that older adults did not show any significant associations among the brain measures and behavior.…”
Section: Correlations Between Brain and Behavioral Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, this association among negative self-assessments, personality, and stronger engagement of these brain networks is interesting in light of the considerable research showing that younger adults tend to have more negative affect than older adults (e.g., Carstensen, et al, 2011;Stone, et al, 2010), and our finding that older adults have weaker activation and functional connectivity in the DN. That is, if older adults modulate their emotional responses to be more positive, in line with their motivational goals Mather & Carstensen, 2005), and activity in the DN is associated with cognitive processes leading to greater negativity, then reduced DN engagement and/or functional connectivity during social cognitive tasks may be a reflection of these goals. It should be noted, however that these interpretations of the relation between DN activity and self-relevant judgments are tentative, given that older adults did not show any significant associations among the brain measures and behavior.…”
Section: Correlations Between Brain and Behavioral Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this work suggests that some aspects of self-reference are not markedly altered as we age, some of the other types of related processing, mentioned above, are influenced by aging. For example, there is considerable evidence that older adults show an increased sensitivity to emotionally positive information, relative to younger adults' focus on negative information, the so-called "positivity bias" or "positivity effect" (e.g., Carstensen, Fung, & Charles, 2003;Ebner, Riediger, & Lindenberger, 2009;Isaacowitz, Allard, Murphy, & Schlangel, 2009;Mather & Carstensen, 2005). This difference in emotional biases is seen in attention and memory (Charles, Mather, & Carstensen, 2003;Grady, Hongwanishkul, Keightley, Lee, & Hasher, 2007;Spaniol, Voss, & Grady, 2008), and is thought to reflect a difference in motivational goals as the end of life approaches .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, McKay and Dennett (2009) have argued that ungrounded or false beliefs are adaptive, a conclusion that has implications for false (or ungrounded) memories. For example, the positivity bias in autobiographical memory, a tendency to accentuate the positive aspects of personal experiences when (inaccurately or falsely) remembering the past, has been linked to enhanced emotional regulation (Mather & Cartensen, 2005). That this positivity bias drives false recollection and not just selective remembering, has been amply shown in recent work by Fernandes, Ross, Wiegand, and Schryer (2008).…”
Section: Design Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In young adults, distinct but adjacent regions of medial prefrontal cortex respond to the degree of self-descriptiveness (i.e., medial prefrontal) and the valence of information (i.e., ventral anterior cingulate cortex; Moran et al, 2006). Because emotional information differentially captures the attention of young and elderly (Charles, Mather, & Carstensen, 2003;Kensinger, Piguet, Krendl, & Corkin, 2005;Mather & Carstensen, 2005), comparisons of valence allow us to assess the degree to which emotion contributes to self-referencing across the age groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%