2010
DOI: 10.1080/01924780903552279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and Disability Awareness Training for Drivers of a Metropolitan Taxi Company

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kalinoski et al [13] found diversity trainings lasting longer than 4 h tended to have larger effects on affective outcomes than did shorter trainings. Research supports diversity training lasting 4 to 6 h as sufficient to effectively change attitudes towards diversity [34,35], and meta-analytic findings suggest that there may be a [36] argued that the pace of diversity trainings is often too rapid for adequate skill development to occur and for trainers to give sufficient attention to cognitive and affective processes that underlie prejudice and discrimination, which may be a partial explanation for the greater efficacy found in training of longer durations. The interventions provided by Shaw et al [27] and Rudstam et al [26] both appear to fit within the guidelines for best practice (Although Rudstam et al did not report the hours for their intervention the description suggests that it exceeded four hours).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kalinoski et al [13] found diversity trainings lasting longer than 4 h tended to have larger effects on affective outcomes than did shorter trainings. Research supports diversity training lasting 4 to 6 h as sufficient to effectively change attitudes towards diversity [34,35], and meta-analytic findings suggest that there may be a [36] argued that the pace of diversity trainings is often too rapid for adequate skill development to occur and for trainers to give sufficient attention to cognitive and affective processes that underlie prejudice and discrimination, which may be a partial explanation for the greater efficacy found in training of longer durations. The interventions provided by Shaw et al [27] and Rudstam et al [26] both appear to fit within the guidelines for best practice (Although Rudstam et al did not report the hours for their intervention the description suggests that it exceeded four hours).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…role playing, discussion, games) were more effective in improving both cognitive and affective outcomes than those that use only passive, lecture-based methods and videos [13]. When reviewing diversity training content, some of the most common active learning practices are role-playing exercises [34,[39][40][41][42][43], simulation exercises [35,42,44,45], case studies/analyses [33,[39][40][41], and group discussions [34, 38-41, 43, 44]. Although these do not encompass the breadth of diversity training practices, these are most common across those programs with significant outcomes.…”
Section: Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen papers utilized theories that utilized individual differences to investigate diversity‐training outcomes. Examples of studies included attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities (Bailey, Barr, & Bunting, ), implicit racial prejudices (Costello, Bouras, & Davis, ), individual differences and participation in diversity training (Kulik, Pepper, Roberson, & Parker, ), aging and disability awareness differences (L. Reynolds, ) and the impact of diversity training on self‐efficacy (Combs & Luthans, ). Other theoretical perspectives utilized include group diversity theory (Ferguson, Keller, Haley, & Quirk, ) and social prejudice and stereotyping (Hite & McDonald, ).…”
Section: Current State Of the Diversity‐training Outcomes Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our sample size and the response rate were relatively small, and therefore, more empirical work is needed to more safely conclude about the generalizability of our study. It might be that only the more reflective taxi drivers may have responded to the questionnaire, and these workers may be more or less prone to stereotyping (Haslam et al, 2012;Reynolds, 2010). Moreover, while taxi driving involves much more time spent with clients than with colleagues, there is evidence that interactions with clients provides an important way for taxi drivers to maintain their health and well-being (Facey, 2010).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%