Aggressive behavior in the antennectomized male cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

Abstract

SUMMARYMale crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) exhibit intensively defensive aggressive behavior towards attacking males most often culminating in fighting. After the fight, the loser no longer exhibits aggressiveness in a second, separate encounter with another male; rather, the defeated male exhibits avoidance behavior. Here, we investigated the role of sensory input from the antennae in male defensive aggressive behavior. When we removed antennae from males (antennectomized males), we found that they showed little aggressiveness towards each other whereas they continued to exhibit typical fighting behavior towards an intact male. In addition, in a second encounter, antennectomized losers showed significantly higher aggressiveness towards another male than did intact losers. We further found that antennectomized crickets do not utilize visual or palpal sensory input to elicit aggressive behavior. In contrast, intact males showed aspects of aggressive behavior to male cuticular substances before and after winning a fight, and if they lost a fight they showed avoidance behavior. It thus appears that antennal sensory information is crucial in the mediation of aggressive and avoidance behaviors. However, sensory inputs from the antennae are not necessary to elicit defensive aggressive behavior but are necessary to discriminate conspecific males and initiate attacks against them. Supplementary material available online at

Releasing stimuli and aggression in crickets: octopamine promotes escalation and maintenance but not initiation

“…The antenna of crickets, and other insects, is a complex multimodal sensory organ, equipped with various and numerous mechanoreceptors and olfactory receptors (review: Staudacher et al, 2005 ), and signals from both types are each thought to be important in controlling the decision to fight or court a conspecific in crickets (Rence and Loher, 1977 ; Hofmann and Schildberger, 2001 ; Nagamoto et al, 2005 ; Iwasaki and Katagiri, 2008 ; Sakura and Aonuma, 2013 ) and fruit flies (Vrontou et al, 2006 ; Certel et al, 2007 ; Chan and Kravitz, 2007 ; Wang and Anderson, 2010 ; Andrews et al, 2014 ).…”

Pre-adult aggression and its long-term behavioural consequences in crickets

“…The most parsimonious explanation for the limited aggressiveness of nymphs is that their ability to respond to the natural aggression-releasing stimulus is not fully developed. In adult crickets, antennal fencing behaviour between males on first contact involves mechanical stimulation with transfer of male-specific semiochemicals that are essential for initiating normal aggression [24][25][26][36][37][38][39]. Notably, and contrasting the central nervous system [40], the sensory system of hemimetabolous insects undergoes dramatic changes during post-embryonic development, including the strengthening of synaptic contacts of existing afferents and the birth of numerous new ones with each moult [41].…”

Ethology of the cricket Endecous (Endecous) chape Souza-Dias & de Mello, 2017 (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae) I: Agonistic and reproductive behavior

“…Agonistic, courtship, or other reproductive processes do not start before antennal contact (Alexander and Otte 1967). Those interactions were preceded by grooming in E. chape, probably allowing the removal of substances that may obstruct olfactory sensilla, impregnating such parts with contact pheromones to recognize partner fitness (Rence and Loher 1977, Balakrishnan and Pollack 1997, Tregenza and Wedell 1997, Böröczky et al 2013, Sakura and Aonuma 2013.…”