2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Releasing stimuli and aggression in crickets: octopamine promotes escalation and maintenance but not initiation

Abstract: Biogenic amines have widespread effects on numerous behaviors, but their natural functions are often unclear. We investigated the role of octopamine (OA), the invertebrate analog of noradrenaline, on initiation and maintenance of aggression in male crickets of different social status. The key-releasing stimulus for aggression is antennal fencing between males, a behavior occurring naturally on initial contact. We show that mechanical antennal stimulation (AS) alone is sufficient to initiate an aggressive respo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That the blockers had no clear effect on fights of otherwise non-stimulated crickets (Figure 4A) is not so surprising considering that amines are not essential for the initiation of aggression per se (Rillich and Stevenson, 2015). While the octopamine receptor blocker epinastine can lead to a just significant reduction of aggression in naïve crickets ( p < 0.05, see Stevenson et al, 2005; Rillich et al, 2011), this is not always evident (e.g., Rillich and Stevenson, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That the blockers had no clear effect on fights of otherwise non-stimulated crickets (Figure 4A) is not so surprising considering that amines are not essential for the initiation of aggression per se (Rillich and Stevenson, 2015). While the octopamine receptor blocker epinastine can lead to a just significant reduction of aggression in naïve crickets ( p < 0.05, see Stevenson et al, 2005; Rillich et al, 2011), this is not always evident (e.g., Rillich and Stevenson, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Rillich and Stevenson, 2015). Supporting this, the level and duration of aggression after AS only, was not significantly different to that for animals that received AS preceded by stimulation with a washed or female antenna.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that particular 5-HT receptor subtypes contribute to the expression and inhibition of distinct aggressive behaviors as seen in Drosophila [16]. This mechanism could be extended further by the possibility of these receptors controlling the release of other neurochemicals known to increase aggression in insects such as octopamine [40,[43][44][45][46][47]. The underlying proximate mechanisms by which 5-HT modulates aggression as well as the correlation with other biochemical systems should be the focus of future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior stimulation of an individual's antenna by manually stroking it with the freshly severed antenna of another adult donor male (priming) is known to increase aggression in adult males, particularly after losing a previous fight [26]. Here we compared how prior antennal Circles: median, boxes: interquartile range, whiskers: 10 th and 90 th percentiles.…”
Section: Influence Of Prior Antennal Stimulation (Priming Effect)mentioning
confidence: 99%