2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation and resuspension of graphene oxide in simulated natural surface aquatic environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical coagulation concentration (CCC) of NaCl for GO aggregation in the absence of minerals was around 50 mM, being in agreement with the previous studies (Chowdhury et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2015). According to the DLVO theory (Chowdhury et al, 2014b; Evans and Wennerstr€ om, 1999; Fan et al, 2015;Hua et al, 2015), the aggregation mechanisms are as follows: When IS below the CCC, the decrease of electrical double layer repulsion between GO sheets was improved by the increase of IS (Chen and Elimelech, 2007), which can be evidenced by the increase of EPM and the decrease of energy barrier with IS (Figs. S13 and S14A), thus, an increase of IS promoted the aggregation extent of GO (Shih et al, 2012); However, with IS above the CCC, almost all GO charges were screened and the aggregation rate of GO reached a maximum and became independent of the IS, correspondingly, the EPM showed little change with increasing IS, when IS was above 50 mM (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Ionic Strength On Go Aggregationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The critical coagulation concentration (CCC) of NaCl for GO aggregation in the absence of minerals was around 50 mM, being in agreement with the previous studies (Chowdhury et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2015). According to the DLVO theory (Chowdhury et al, 2014b; Evans and Wennerstr€ om, 1999; Fan et al, 2015;Hua et al, 2015), the aggregation mechanisms are as follows: When IS below the CCC, the decrease of electrical double layer repulsion between GO sheets was improved by the increase of IS (Chen and Elimelech, 2007), which can be evidenced by the increase of EPM and the decrease of energy barrier with IS (Figs. S13 and S14A), thus, an increase of IS promoted the aggregation extent of GO (Shih et al, 2012); However, with IS above the CCC, almost all GO charges were screened and the aggregation rate of GO reached a maximum and became independent of the IS, correspondingly, the EPM showed little change with increasing IS, when IS was above 50 mM (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Ionic Strength On Go Aggregationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…21 One should consider the fact that their estimation is for a GO−water−quartz system and should not be employed for a GO−water−GO system (the mistake that has been made in recent literature on GO aggregation studies). 7,27,28 The H for GO and rGO across the different liquids is also calculated and presented in Table 1. It must be noted that eq 3 is derived for two atomically thin sheets, but the values obtained above are valid for two semiinfinite slabs.…”
Section: ■ Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] Graphene nanosheets may end up in the environment in various forms of particulate matter such as crumpled graphene, [8][9][10] multilayer graphene, 4,5,11 shattered nanosheets, 12 and fractal aggregates/hetero-aggregates. 13,14 Once they have entered aquatic environments, aggregation of such particles can significantly affect their functionality and transport behaviour, particularly in aqueous and porous media. 4,5,15 Despite the existence of many studies on homo-and hetero-aggregation of various nanoparticles (NP), 14,[16][17][18][19][20][21] and abundant reports on the impacts of various factors on the aggregation behaviour of these NP, [22][23][24][25][26] it still remains a problem of how system dynamics modify aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%