2017
DOI: 10.21071/az.v66i253.2124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agentes causadores de mastite e relações entre a CCS com a produção e com a composição do leite em vacas leiteiras

Abstract: Este estudo teve por objetivo avaliar o efeito da prevalência de patógenos causadores de mastite e da contagem de células somáticas (CCS) sobre a produção e composição do leite. Amostras de leite de 1163 vacas da raça Holandesa com 30.97±10.22 kg·d-1 de produção de leite foram coletadas e avaliadas. Staphylococcus spp. foi o patógeno mais prevalente. No geral, o aumento da CCS reduziu a produção de leite e a concentração de lactose e aumentou a concentração de proteína. Coliformes tiveram uma relação diferente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCC coefficients confirmed the negative influence on SNF% and Lact% in line with the literature (França et al, 2017). Regarding milk fat concentration, the positive values of the PF3 and negative values of the PF1 imply that the supply of larger quantities of farm-made concentrate with the low supply of byproducts and corn silage and predominance of crossbred cows (Figure 1) are associated with a higher milk fat concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SCC coefficients confirmed the negative influence on SNF% and Lact% in line with the literature (França et al, 2017). Regarding milk fat concentration, the positive values of the PF3 and negative values of the PF1 imply that the supply of larger quantities of farm-made concentrate with the low supply of byproducts and corn silage and predominance of crossbred cows (Figure 1) are associated with a higher milk fat concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The negative linear relation observed between PF2 and milk yield and SNF% and Lact% is explained by the use of high quantities of sugarcane in detriment of corn silage in the less intensified SDS (Figure 1, Table 4), decreasing nutrient supply and thus milk yield and SNF% (Oliveira et al, 2011). The lower nutrient supply and highest SCC lowered Lact% in the milk (França et al, 2017). In the present study, 38.7% of SDS provided corn silage and 48.3% sugarcane as a source of roughage, while 13% relied on pasture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…With increasing milk yield, the amount of protein decreases, explaining the opposite signs of the path coefficients of milk yield and protein content in our model [46]. Regarding udder health, protein content reacted very sensitively, especially to somatic cell count alterations, while fat content was more stable [9]. In our SEM analogy, path coefficients were larger for protein than for fat content.…”
Section: Manifest Variables On Intramammary Infection and Productionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Intramammary infection impairs milk yield and milk composition. Additionally, in recursive biological systems, the level of milk yield and composition might influence the susceptibility of an udder infection [8,9]. In addition, from an "environmental" perspective, the age of the animal, the status of nutrition and many other factors such as climate play a role in determining an animal's susceptibility for an infection [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dairy production has a major problem, mastitis, which consists of an infection of the mammary gland. It is responsible for major economic losses, for causing a reduction in the production and quality of milk in the affected mammary quarters, in addition to interfering in the industrial dairy process (França et al, 2017;Terra et al, 2020). The loss of production can be drastic, especially when a significant percentage of the herd is infected, which can reduce milk production by up to 50% in addition to decreasing the productive life of the cow (Mostert et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%