2004
DOI: 10.1177/107769900408100209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agenda Setting and International News: Media Influence on Public Perceptions of Foreign Nations

Abstract: A national poll and a content analysis of network newscasts examined if coverage of foreign nations had an agenda-setting influence. The more media coverage a nation received, the more likely respondents were to think the nation was vitally important to U.S. interests, supporting the agenda-setting hypothesis. The more negative coverage a nation received, the more likely respondents were to think negatively about the nation, supporting the second level of agenda setting. Positive coverage of a nation had no in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
327
1
16

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 456 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
327
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings can help assess which aspects of reality will receive more attention in the media and, second, they show how to apply public relations instruments in order to increase the amount of general and positive news coverage. This could result in more positive attitudes Bereitgestellt von | Universitätsbibliothek Ilmenau Angemeldet Heruntergeladen am | 15.10.14 16:46 towards a certain country (Kiousis and Wu, 2005;Wanta, Golan, and Lee, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings can help assess which aspects of reality will receive more attention in the media and, second, they show how to apply public relations instruments in order to increase the amount of general and positive news coverage. This could result in more positive attitudes Bereitgestellt von | Universitätsbibliothek Ilmenau Angemeldet Heruntergeladen am | 15.10.14 16:46 towards a certain country (Kiousis and Wu, 2005;Wanta, Golan, and Lee, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to our subject of study, we can affirm that the power of mass media is much stronger on public opinion perceptions regarding foreign issues (Wanta et al 2004). This can be explained by two main reasons.…”
Section: The Other Side Of the Coin: Argentinian Public Opinion Pmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Agenda-setting effects have been identified in virtually every U.S. election since the 1970s, and the implications for public perception and public policy are significant and far-reaching. The media have been shown to affect how people think about everything from other nations in general (Wanta, Golan, and Lee 2004) to domestic civil rights in particular (Winter and Eyal 1981), along with a large range of other social issues. This is not to say, however, that the effects have been either uniform or unambiguous.…”
Section: Cognitive Effects: Knowledge Gap Hypothesis and Agenda-settimentioning
confidence: 99%