Agency Governance in the European Union's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice

Kaunert, Christian; Léonard, Sarah; Occhipinti, John D.

doi:10.1080/15705854.2013.817806

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, existing literatures analyse the novel institutional forms of European security. Authors explore how European security integration takes the form of networks, bringing together professionals and authorities across member states and even third countries (Den Boer et al ., 2008; Bicchi and Carta, 2012; Kaunert et al ., 2013; Cross, 2019). A growing strand of literature studies the security politics of EU agencies (Neal, 2009; Busuioc and Groenleer, 2013; Paul, 2017).…”

Section: Theorizing Eu Security and Content Moderationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co‐Producing Security: Platform Content Moderation and European Security Integration

Bellanova

Goede

2021

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Union (EU) seeks to play a leading role in steering the private work of online content moderation, as demonstrated by numerous policy and legislative initiatives in the domain. Two initiatives, in particular, are shaping terrorist content moderation: the creation of a EU Internet Referral Unit and the adoption of a Regulation on preventing the online dissemination of terrorist content (TERREG). This article analyses these initiatives and their practical effects. In particular, it unpacks the legal and technological mechanisms at the core of EU regulation in the realm of online terrorist content moderation, and how they co‐produce security decisions across public and private spheres. Based on interviews, fieldwork observations and document analysis, we show how processes of referral and removal, and processes of flagging and filtering are key to EU‐directed content moderation. In conclusion, we reflect on content moderation as a novel form of European security integration.

show abstract

Section: Theorizing Eu Security and Content Moderationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co‐Producing Security: Platform Content Moderation and European Security Integration

Bellanova

Goede

2021

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The activities and objectives of most agencies remain out of the public realm, and often out of the reach of the EP and the ECJ, which has emphasised the difficulty in overseeing these agencies and ensuring a minimum level of accountability and transparency (Bigo 2007;Kaunert et al 2013;Trauner 2012). While Europol and Frontex 5 have received more public and academic attention, Eurojust 6 and other specific actors and structures such as Sitcen (Joint Situation Centre) 7 or networks of security professionals remain relatively unknown, probably as a reflection of the limited extent of their activities or the difficulty in accessing them.…”

Section: The Role Of Eu Institutions In the Area Of Freedom Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional and Policy Change in the European Parliament

Servent¹

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In this respect, the AFSJ set out to become the EU area of risk management, assuring common security through control and surveillance (Fletcher et al, 2017;Kaunert et al, 2013;Trauner & Ripoll Servent, 2016). The Amsterdam Treaty has strengthened the symbolic authority of security professionals to speak and define immigration, preparing the grounds for the emergence of the EU internal security agencies (e.g.…”

Section: From Maastricht To Lisbon Tracing "Constitutional" Securitis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

EU Migration-Security Continuum. Investigating Security Frames Before the “Migration Crisis”

Stępka

2022

IMISCOE Research Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The chapter discusses historical development of the securitisation of migration at the EU level, outlining its different modes and venues. It discusses how the Schengen zone has become the seminal project for development of the EU border control regime reflected predominantly in the managerial approach to security practices and discourses towards migrants in the EU. It further the covers development of EU asylum policies, elaborating upon intertwining policy narratives of humanitarianism, illegality and bogus claims of asylum seekers in the EU. Lastly, the chapter discusses EU policies on detention and deportation, examining them as securitising practices of containment and control. In this way, the chapter unravels the complexity of the so-called migration-security continuum in the EU, discussing its historical and institutional development, indicating how the logics of human security, “exceptionality” and most notably risk management have become points of reference for framing of the “migration crisis”.

show abstract

Agency Governance in the European Union's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice

Cited by 11 publications

References 51 publications

Co‐Producing Security: Platform Content Moderation and European Security Integration

Co‐Producing Security: Platform Content Moderation and European Security Integration

Institutional and Policy Change in the European Parliament

EU Migration-Security Continuum. Investigating Security Frames Before the “Migration Crisis”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About