2016
DOI: 10.2337/dc15-2308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Specific Trends From 2000–2011 in All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study of More Than One Million People

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo analyze changes by age-group in all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates from 2000-2011 in people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA total of 1,189,079 (7.3% with type 1 diabetes) Australians with diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Service Scheme between 2000 and 2011 were linked to the National Death Index. Mortality rates in the total population were age standardized to the 2001 Australian population. Mortality rates were calculated for the following age-groups: 0 to <40 ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
86
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
13
86
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results corroborate the general observation that diabetic patients have a higher mortality rate than the nondiabetic population under long-term observation in all subsets of coronary disease despite adjusting for baseline differences [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Most studies have only addressed survival either in type 1 or type 2 diabetes, separately, or in diabetic patients in general, and we found only 2 recent studies that actually compare survival in both type 1 and 2 diabetics with that of a nondiabetic population [23,24]. Both these studies support our observation of a higher mortality in type 1 than in type 2 diabetic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Our results corroborate the general observation that diabetic patients have a higher mortality rate than the nondiabetic population under long-term observation in all subsets of coronary disease despite adjusting for baseline differences [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Most studies have only addressed survival either in type 1 or type 2 diabetes, separately, or in diabetic patients in general, and we found only 2 recent studies that actually compare survival in both type 1 and 2 diabetics with that of a nondiabetic population [23,24]. Both these studies support our observation of a higher mortality in type 1 than in type 2 diabetic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Thus, despite advances in the treatment of diabetes, there still appears to be a persistent excess risk of mortality among this population (21). Baena-Díez et al (10) showed that individuals with diabetes have an approximately threefold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, which is much higher than what has been reported by recent studies (5,6).…”
contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…We considered these deaths as due to CVD, IHD or stroke, as it is not possible to die from 'uncomplicated diabetes'. The NDSS dataset linked to the NDI has previously been used to present age-specific mortality rates among those with diabetes [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%