Age, sex, causal and injury patterns in tarsometatarsal dislocations: A literature review of over 2000 cases

Lievers, W. Brent; Frimenko, Rebecca E.; Crandall, Jeffrey Richard; Kent, Richard W.; Park, Joseph S.

doi:10.1016/j.foot.2012.03.003

Cited by 22 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 135 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Lievers et al (2012) 11 conducted a literature review of Lisfranc dislocations. The most frequently reported injury mechanisms were traffic accidents (43%), fall from height (24%), direct crush (13%), sports (10%), and equestrian (1%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incidence and Characteristics of Midfoot Injuries

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lisfranc injury was originally described as a partial or complete dislocation of the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joints by Quenu and Kuss in 1909. 18 Nunley and Vertullo 16 described that the injury can also be subtle when there is no detectable dislocation in nonweightbearing radiographs. Recently, however, Chiodo and Myerson 2 introduced a new approach to these injuries where they suggested to divide the injuries in medial (TMT 1), central (TMT 2-3), and lateral (TMT 4-5) columns. Lau et al 10 completed the columnar approach with a classification where the prognosis of injury is related to number of affected columns and displacement (less or more than 2 mm) instead of the diastasis between I and II TMT joints. Main and Jowett 13 developed a classification for Chopart injuries, where they stated that these injuries vary from small avulsion fragments to severe subluxation of the whole joint. Diagnostics have become more precise as a result of the more common use of computed tomography (CT). It is unclear whether there is such a type of injury as "purely ligamentous injury," or whether is it detectable from bony avulsion fragments. 7,8,17 The definitions and classifications of these injuries has changed, and still, 100 799741F AIXXX10.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incidence and Characteristics of Midfoot Injuries

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The strongest high-level or landmark literature informing the modern decision making for managing the Lisfranc injury is almost entirely in high-energy populations. 8,10,12,14,15,18,23 Studies addressing athletic, or low-energy, injuries have primarily been small case-series with little to no comparative information. 5,6,16,20 Similarly, research addressing injury characteristics has primarily consisted of high-energy injuries.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Injury Characteristics of Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries Compared With High-Energy Injuries

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A recent review of over 2000 published cases reported that 43% occurred during motor vehicle accidents; 10% during sporting activity; 13% due to crush injuries; and 24% from falls, jumps, and twisting injuries. 13 Most authors typically generalize TMT injuries into 2 groups: relatively low-energy injuries that often occur in the athletic population during sporting activity, and higher energy injuries seen in patients involved in motor vehicle accidents, among others. 7 The higher energy injuries are often associated with more significant bony injuries and compartment syndromes of the foot.…”

Section: Etiologymentioning

confidence: 99%