2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10696-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related processing delay reveals cause of apparent sensory excitability following auditory stimulation

Abstract: When background auditory events lead to enhanced auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) for closely following sounds, this is generally interpreted as a transient increase in the responsiveness of the auditory system. We measured ERPs elicited by irrelevant probes (gaps in a continuous tone) at several time-points following rare auditory events (pitch glides) in younger and older adults, who watched movies during stimulation. Fitting previous results, in younger adults, gaps elicited increasing N1 auditory E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 85 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon, referred as N1 facilitation, has been hypothesized as caused by several factors: (1) an accelerated decay of inhibitory over excitatory postsynaptic potentials at high (<200 ms) stimulation rates (Loveless et al, 1989); (2) avoiding a latent inhibitory feedback from N1 generators if stimulus is presented before inhibition takes place (Sable et al, 2004); (3) a separate neural component with a time course overlapping N1 and P2 that is modulated exclusively by very short ISI (Wang et al, 2008). Some evidence supports this overlapping component may be Mismatch Negativity (Volosin et al, 2017(Volosin et al, , 2021. Our results best fit the third hypothesis, as P2 in addition to N1 followed a different pattern of results under our shortest ISI, reduced more prominently than for other ISIs.…”
Section: Long-latency Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, referred as N1 facilitation, has been hypothesized as caused by several factors: (1) an accelerated decay of inhibitory over excitatory postsynaptic potentials at high (<200 ms) stimulation rates (Loveless et al, 1989); (2) avoiding a latent inhibitory feedback from N1 generators if stimulus is presented before inhibition takes place (Sable et al, 2004); (3) a separate neural component with a time course overlapping N1 and P2 that is modulated exclusively by very short ISI (Wang et al, 2008). Some evidence supports this overlapping component may be Mismatch Negativity (Volosin et al, 2017(Volosin et al, , 2021. Our results best fit the third hypothesis, as P2 in addition to N1 followed a different pattern of results under our shortest ISI, reduced more prominently than for other ISIs.…”
Section: Long-latency Responsementioning
confidence: 99%