2020
DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Related Differences in Financial Toxicity and Unmet Resource Needs Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients

Abstract: Financial toxicity may differ by age at diagnosis between adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. We surveyed 52 AYA cancer patients about unmet needs and financial toxicity using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). We compared outcomes by age at diagnosis (15-25-year olds [n = 25, 48%] vs. 26-39-year olds [n = 27, 52%]). AYAs diagnosed ages 26-39 reported that cancer negatively affected their finances more than 15-25-year olds (77.8% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.0005). Lower mean COST scores a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, patients who diagnosed with cancer at younger ages (50 years old below) reported greater financial toxicity than elderly survivors (above 50 years old). This is consistent with past studies such as Ramsey et al (2013) and Kaddas et al (2020). Younger cancer survivors are 2 to 5 times higher in bankruptcy rate and prone to greater financial toxicity compared to cancer patients aged 65 or older.…”
Section: The Inference Of Socio-demographic and Clinical Differences supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, patients who diagnosed with cancer at younger ages (50 years old below) reported greater financial toxicity than elderly survivors (above 50 years old). This is consistent with past studies such as Ramsey et al (2013) and Kaddas et al (2020). Younger cancer survivors are 2 to 5 times higher in bankruptcy rate and prone to greater financial toxicity compared to cancer patients aged 65 or older.…”
Section: The Inference Of Socio-demographic and Clinical Differences supporting
confidence: 92%
“…For younger adults and adolescents who were still financially dependent on parents, this occupational disruption is likely to have been experienced differently. 26 These early work-related setbacks could start a cascade toward reduced occupational opportunities and persistent financial distress that has been reported elsewhere. 8,15,27 Our findings, however, should be interpreted in light of several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Some authors [ 22 ] studied samples with different ages to verify the COST score in samples with different characteristics and observed an average score of 24.84 among individuals aged 15 to 25 years old, and 18.22 among those in the age range 26 to 39 years old. We can conclude with the study that younger people have greater financial toxicity in that sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%