2000
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/55.6.p332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Related Differences in Dual-Task Visual Search: Are Performance Gains Retained?

Abstract: Older and young adults practiced a verbal/spatial dual task and were tested for retention performance 1 month later. Participants first practiced each component task separately to individually determine component processing time. Thus, age-related differences in single-task detection sensitivity were minimized prior to performing the dual task. Participants practiced the dual task for two 1.5-hour sessions. Following the retention interval, they were retested on the single-task components and on the dual task.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this condition, both young and older adults in the training groups showed significant reductions in task-set cost, which was not observed for the control subjects. This is an important finding and suggests that dual-task skills were improved through training, and that learning entailed more than specific stimulus-response mappings (Batsakes & Fisk, 2000; Ho & Scialfa, 2002). However, it is also important to emphasize that dual-task costs did not show the same improvement in these cross-modality transfer conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this condition, both young and older adults in the training groups showed significant reductions in task-set cost, which was not observed for the control subjects. This is an important finding and suggests that dual-task skills were improved through training, and that learning entailed more than specific stimulus-response mappings (Batsakes & Fisk, 2000; Ho & Scialfa, 2002). However, it is also important to emphasize that dual-task costs did not show the same improvement in these cross-modality transfer conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The transfer effects are important to show that dual-task skills improved through training, and that learning entailed more than specific stimulus-response mappings (Batsakes & Fisk, 2000; Ho & Scialfa, 2002). Many previous studies have found either very narrow transfer after cognitive training or have failed to observe any transfer from one task to another (e.g., Ball et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important research issue in the field of cognitive training is the extent to which computerized cognitive stimulation training would lead to improved performance in tasks or situations that have not been specifically trained. Such transfer effects help demonstrate that dual‐task skills improved through training entail more than simple learning of task‐specific stimulus–response mappings. Among studies that used dual‐task training with older adults, some studies have reported significant transfer effects; however, others have not.…”
Section: Improving Dual‐task Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navon and Miller (1987) suggested that dual-task costs in old age result from a limited capacity to organize and execute motor responses. Lack of flexibility in switching attentional resources between tasks (Kortling, 1991) and the proclivity for a conservative response bias (Batsakes & Fisk, 2000; Glass et al, 2000) were also offered as possible contributors to age-related decline in dual-task performance.…”
Section: Age-related Decline In Dual-task Performancementioning
confidence: 99%