2005
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Age-Related Dual-Task Effects With Individual Differences on Neuropsychological Tests.

Abstract: This study examined the relation of dual-task performance to individual differences on neuropsychological tests. Neuropsychological test scores from 16 young and 16 older participants were simultaneously submitted to a factor analysis that yielded 2 factors (Attention/Executive and Memory) that differed by age and 2 (Motor Speed and Cognitive Status) that did not. Regression analyses revealed that these factors were significant predictors of performance on a delayed visual recognition task, but the relationshi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
54
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these findings suggest that, in the elderly, hand-food coordination strongly activated classical coordination areas but also several frontal regions interfacing motor control and cognition. This suggests that older subjects relied on increased cognitive monitoring of the more complex motor tasks, which is consistent with recent behavioral results (Holtzer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Coordination-specific Additional Activation In the Elderlysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Overall, these findings suggest that, in the elderly, hand-food coordination strongly activated classical coordination areas but also several frontal regions interfacing motor control and cognition. This suggests that older subjects relied on increased cognitive monitoring of the more complex motor tasks, which is consistent with recent behavioral results (Holtzer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Coordination-specific Additional Activation In the Elderlysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Traditionally, the interference has been presumed to occur because of competing demands for attention resources [1]. However, recent studies have suggested that compromised executive control may underlie CMI [2,3]. Identification of the specific cognitive domains associated with gait decline during dual task activities may help inform clinical evaluation and treatment planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can manipulate the extrinsic difficulty of a DRT by varying presentation set size Rypma, Eldreth, & Rebbechi, 2007;Zarahn et al, 2006) or by varying the duration of the probe stimulus (Corbett & Wickelgren, 1978;Dosher, 1984;Dosher, McElree, Hood, & Rosedale, 1989;Hintzman, Caulton, & Curran, 1994;McElree & Dosher, 1993;Reed, 1973Reed, , 1976Wickelgren, 1977). Moreover, DRTs allow manipulation of extrinsic difficulty without the use of dual-task methods (e.g., N. D. Anderson, Craik, & Naveh-Benjamin, 1998) and without any temporal overlap of task elements, as in the n-back task (e.g., Jonides et al, 1997).Previous experiments have used Rypma and D'Esposito's (1999) variant of the DRT with letters of the Latin alphabet as stimuli (e.g., Habeck et al, 2005;Holtzer et al, 2004Holtzer et al, , 2005Zarahn et al, 2005Zarahn et al, , 2006. These studies characterized the aural component of the Baddeley and Hitch (1974) model of WM-the phonological loop-which was theorized to support the retention of letter stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed unfamiliar, abstract (i.e., difficult to name) shape stimuli, which we assumed would require use of the visuospatial sketchpad, to provide information about WM in aging that complements the previous studies. In a prior DRT experiment, these shape stimuli were used along with letter stimuli to compare the parallel processing of the phonological loop and the visuospatial sketchpad (Holtzer et al, 2004(Holtzer et al, , 2005.In the present study, we manipulated the extrinsic difficulty of a DRT by varying the probe duration and eliciting the recognition response promptly after termination of the probe. This technique, known as the response-signal method (RSM), varies the duration of the retrieval process and usually results in a speed-accuracy tradeoff (Reed, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation