2020
DOI: 10.1080/0361073x.2020.1716152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Related Changes in Verbal Working Memory Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some research (e.g., Chevalère et al., 2020; DeDe, 2014) suggests that declines in processing speed are themselves a compensation mechanism for working with limited resources in older age. The potential reasons for this are manifold: older adults have fewer available cognitive resources to dedicate to a task, and may choose more selectively where to dedicate these resources and when to avoid an overload of cognitive demand (Brébion, 2003; Hess, 2014).…”
Section: Ageing Memory and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some research (e.g., Chevalère et al., 2020; DeDe, 2014) suggests that declines in processing speed are themselves a compensation mechanism for working with limited resources in older age. The potential reasons for this are manifold: older adults have fewer available cognitive resources to dedicate to a task, and may choose more selectively where to dedicate these resources and when to avoid an overload of cognitive demand (Brébion, 2003; Hess, 2014).…”
Section: Ageing Memory and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that the use of semantic information may counteract memory declines, and that an absence of semantic content may exacerbate sentence processing deficits (e.g., Poulisse et al., 2019). Another potential source of compensation includes strategic slowing, where older adults’ slower processing speed (Salthouse, 1996) is seen as a strategy to selectively deploy the reduced cognitive resources available to older adults (e.g., Chevalère et al., 2020). Whether these compensation mechanisms play a significant role, and to what extent they account for older adults’ performance on linguistic tasks, as well as the question whether they apply similarly to all languages, is a necessary topic for future investigation.…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Study 1, the strategies used were coded according to their effectiveness and the cognitive resources they require (0 for no strategy, 1 for strategy based on the morphological characteristics of words, 2 for repetition, 3 for sentence construction and 4 for mental imagery). The mean percentage of use of each strategy, as well as the number of strategies used were also calculated for the analyses (Chevalère et al., 2020).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that participants engage in additional processes, such as grouping or chunking of the presented list (e.g., Belletier et al, Under review; Logie et al, 1996), that may serve to make representations less susceptible to disruption from ongoing processing. Older adults appear to be less efficient at this kind of processing (Naveh-Benjamin et al, 2007) or they may adopt a different, possibly more time consuming, approach to the task (Chevalère et al, 2020; Logie, 2018), which may have contributed to their larger dual task cost. Varying the time available for the full encoding and, possibly, strengthening (rehearsal/refreshing) of the to-be-remembered list prior to the onset of processing could conceivably modulate the dual task cost for both memory (overall accuracy) and processing (first RTs) and, more importantly, modulate age differences in these costs.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Time Between List Presentation and Processing...mentioning
confidence: 99%