Craniofacial Identification 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139049566.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age progression and regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to understand and produce a more accurate depiction, images of siblings and parents at the same age of the progression are often required to help artists to maintain a reliable likeness with biological resemblance (Lampinen et al, 2015). But when these images are not available, a more general reference will be used, such as images of other children of the same age (Mullins, 2012).…”
Section: Manual Age Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to understand and produce a more accurate depiction, images of siblings and parents at the same age of the progression are often required to help artists to maintain a reliable likeness with biological resemblance (Lampinen et al, 2015). But when these images are not available, a more general reference will be used, such as images of other children of the same age (Mullins, 2012).…”
Section: Manual Age Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original images should be altered as little as possible to retain certain facial characteristics, by using reference material of other children, and only small portions should be used to avoid resemblance to the templates (Mullins, 2012). Manual age progression methods are subjective, not standardised and often practitioner-dependant (Charman and Carol, 2012;Koudelová et al, 2015;Lampinen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Manual Age Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations