2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age predicts outcomes better than frailty following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective cohort analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unexpectedly, MFI-11 and MFI-5 were not well able to predict the outcomes in aSAH. This was also reported in a previous study of aSAH [25]. There are a few potential reasons that this might be the case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unexpectedly, MFI-11 and MFI-5 were not well able to predict the outcomes in aSAH. This was also reported in a previous study of aSAH [25]. There are a few potential reasons that this might be the case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In neurosurgery, the concept of frailty has been explored in various subspecialty conditions including brain tumour [19,20], chronic subdural haematoma [21], and spine surgery [22][23][24]. Although some work has been published on aSAH in the frail [25,26] and in the elderly [27,28], there has been no study comparing the various indices on the outcomes of this condition. Sarcopaenia and osteopaenia, the loss of muscle and bone mass, has been noted to be associated with frailty [29,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frailty is an emerging concept that aims to quantify the cumulative effect of these comorbidities in order to more accurately prognosticate outcomes. In neurosurgery specifically, frailty has been associated with poorer outcomes following subarachnoid hemorrhage [ 5 , 11 ], spine surgery [ 16 ], intracranial hemorrhage [ 17 ], and intra-cranial tumor surgery [ 18 ]. Despite this, there are over 215 established frailty indices [ 7 ] and no consensus on the optimal scoring system or appropriate cutoffs [ 19 ]; something that may be disease and patient-population specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eleven-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was calculated by assigning one point for the presence of each of the following pre-hemorrhage characteristics for a maximum of 11 points: hypertension requiring medication, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, previous percutaneous coronary intervention or angina, transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident without neurological deficit, cerebrovascular accident with neurological deficit, peripheral vascular disease or ischemic chest pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or current pneumonia, diabetes mellitus, non-independent functional status, and impaired sensorium (Table 1 ). Non-independent functional status was defined as requiring assistance from another person for activities of daily living [ 8 - 11 ]. The five-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was defined similarly but with the presence of hypertension requiring medication, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or current pneumonia, diabetes mellitus, or non-independent functional status [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there have been many studies examining cranial neurosurgical patient outcomes using both the CCI and the mFI-11 (Table 5), to our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the mFI-5's utility in predicting postoperative outcomes within this specific patient population. 1,5,11,12,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]…”
Section: -Factor Modified Frailty Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%