The Effect of Frailty versus Initial Glasgow Coma Score in Predicting Outcomes Following Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage: A Preliminary Analysis

Abstract

Background Initial Glasgow Coma Score (iGCS) is a well-known predictor of adverse outcomes following chronic subdural hemorrhage (cSDH). Frailty, i.e. a reduced physiologic reserve, is associated with poorer outcomes across the surgical literature, however, there is no consensus on the best measure of frailty. To date, no study has compared frailty’s ability to predict cSDH outcomes versus iGCS. The goal of this study was to, therefore, examine the prognostic value of the 5- (mFI-5) and 11-factor (mFI-11) modified frailty index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) versus iGCS following cSDH. Methods Between January, 2016 and June, 2018, patients who presented to the emergency department with cSDH were retrospectively identified using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. mFI-5, mFI-11, and CCI scores were calculated using patient baseline characteristics. Primary endpoints were death and discharge home and subgroup analyses were performed among operative cSDH. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine predictors of primary endpoints. Results Of the 109 patients identified, the average age was 72.6±1.6 years and the majority (69/109, 63.3%) were male. The average CCI, mFI-5, and mFI-11 were 4.5 ±0.2, 1.5 ±0.1, and 2.2 ±0.1, respectively. Fifty (45.9%) patients required surgical intervention, 11 (10.1%) died, and 48 (43.4%) were discharged home. In the overall cohort, while the only multivariate predictor of mortality was iGCS (OR=0.58; 95%CI:0.44-0.77; p=0.0001), the CCI (OR=0.73; 95%CI:0.58-0.92; p=0.0082) was a superior predictor of discharge home compared to iGCS (OR=1.46; 95%CI:1.13-1.90; p=0.0041). Conversely, among those who received an operative intervention, the CCI, but not iGCS, independently predicted both mortality (OR=4.24; 95%CI:1.01-17.86; p=0.0491) and discharge home (OR=0.55; 95%CI:0.33-0.90; p=0.0170). Neither mFI nor age predicted primary outcomes in multivariate analysis. Conclusion While frailty is associated with worse surgical outcomes, the clinical utility of the mFI-5, mFI-11, and CCI in cSDH is unclear. We show that the iGCS is an overall superior predictor of mortality following cSDH but is outperformed by the CCI after operative intervention. Similarly, the CCI is the superior predictor of discharge home in cSDH patients overall and following an operative intervention. These results indicate that while the iGCS best predicts mortality overall, the CCI may be considered when prognosticating post-operative course and hospital disposition.

Demographics and Outcomes of Interhospital Transfer Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

“…To measure frailty, we used the 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11), an 11-point scale based on the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Frailty Index [12,13]. The mFI-11 predicts postoperative outcomes in many surgical subspecialties, including neurosurgery [14][15][16]. The mFI-11 was calculated retrospectively during chart review by tallying the comorbid conditions listed in the scale.…”

Third Ventricle Volume Predicts Functional Outcome in Chronic Subdural Hematoma

“…Admission values for NIHSS and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were introduced to the discharge NIHSS multivariable analysis and short‐term mRS, respectively. GCS was selected as a potential confounder in the multivariable model, given its demonstrated role to predict functional outcome 12 . Similarly, age was introduced as a potential confounder in the multivariable analysis of both endpoints.…”

“…There is a paucity of evidence demonstrating the value of a preoperative assessment tool to predict CSDH outcomes after BHC evacuation. Variables such as age and preoperative comorbid status are relevant, although they are insufficient to predict postoperative functional outcomes 1,9‐12 . Instead, accurate prediction of postoperative outcomes warrants a multidisciplinary approach weighing radiographic, etiologic, and management‐related factors.…”

Frailty and Emergency Surgery: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…A meta-analysis demonstrated that frail surgical patients had a higher risk of readmission and increased risk of mortality ( 7 ). In a very recent preliminary analysis McIntyre et al found that frailty was associated with worse surgical outcomes following chronic subdural hemorrhage, but the clinical utility of the frailty scores remained unclear ( 8 ). In a large prospective multinational study Haas et al demonstrated that frailty was significantly associated with an increased 6-month mortality in elderly intensive care patients admitted with sepsis ( 9 ).…”