2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age differences in the personality hierarchy: A multi-sample replication study across the life span

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De Vries et al ( 2016) use cross-rater agreement estimates of the HEXACO-PI-R to evaluate a number of other item characteristics, but do not report the property per se. Hang et al (2021) showed that both HEXACO items and their unique variances predicted age with twice as much accuracy as HEXACO domains, and 39% more accurately than facetsfindings much in line with those listed above for FFM items (Mõttus & Rozgonjuk, 2019). However, other empirical properties of the items of the HEXACO-PI-R have yet to be reported, and it remains possible that HEXACO domains collectively cover the personality trait space more comprehensively than the FFM (Thielmann et al, 2021), leaving less unique variance for personality nuances.…”
Section: What Makes a Unique Trait?supporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…De Vries et al ( 2016) use cross-rater agreement estimates of the HEXACO-PI-R to evaluate a number of other item characteristics, but do not report the property per se. Hang et al (2021) showed that both HEXACO items and their unique variances predicted age with twice as much accuracy as HEXACO domains, and 39% more accurately than facetsfindings much in line with those listed above for FFM items (Mõttus & Rozgonjuk, 2019). However, other empirical properties of the items of the HEXACO-PI-R have yet to be reported, and it remains possible that HEXACO domains collectively cover the personality trait space more comprehensively than the FFM (Thielmann et al, 2021), leaving less unique variance for personality nuances.…”
Section: What Makes a Unique Trait?supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Our findings do not disconfirm that HEXACO provides an as good and possibly even better model for parsimoniously describing individual differences than the FFM. However, our findings do suggest that, as one goes further and further down the trait hierarchy, personality is structured in far more complex ways so that differentiating between five or six broad factors at the top does not make much meaningful difference in the sheer amount of information that a test captures in a person (e.g., see Hang et al, 2021 regarding the capture of age differences). So, besides pitting different Big Few models against each other, more research could investigate how and why certain items appear to capture more unique personality information than othersand why seemingly unique properties should all seem to converge as though they were indexing some general "goodness of item" or "goodness of nuance" feature.…”
Section: Items Capture Traits Regardless Of the Instrument They Belon...mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their study, at least one item was often able to contribute to predictions, even in cases in which the respective trait score was not related to the outcome. Notably, however, beyond relations to age (Hang et al, 2021), nationality (Achaa-Amankwaa et al, 2021), functioning, or performance, there is little evidence for differential personality nuance associations with physiological variables. For example, Hyatt et al (2022) found that in relation to indicators of the brain structure, individual personality nuances did not show stronger associations than broader personality domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%