Age Differences in Individuals' Cognitive and Behavioral Moral Functioning Responses in Male Soccer Teams

Romand, P.; Pantaléon, Nathalie; Cabagno, Genevieve

doi:10.1080/10413200802383055

Cited by 20 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(63 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the predominant model of this process is put forward by Rest (1986). Although this model has a certain age, this extensive work on the understanding of ethical behavior remains today’s benchmark for studying ethical behavior (Romand et al, 2009; Rudd et al, 2010; Craft, 2013; Constandt et al, 2018). According to Rest (1986), any form of ethical behavior can be broken down into a four-steps process.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Badminton Players’ Moral Intentions: A Factorial Survey Study Into Personal and Contextual Determinants

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Improving and maintaining high ethical standards among athletes is a major challenge in sports, which requires sufficient knowledge on athletes’ moral intentions. This study advances our knowledge on athletes’ moral intentions by examining the personal and contextual determinants (factors) that influence moral intentions of badminton players. In a factorial survey study, a total of 171 participants were asked to respond to scenarios describing moral dilemmas in the context of badminton. This approach allows combining advantages from both classical experiments and survey methods, enabling the determination of the underlying principles of the judgments and intentions of respondents. Multilevel analysis indicated that intention to engage in the described behavior was impacted by both the act and the gender of the subject. This study complements previous research on athletes’ moral intentions by the advanced method of factorial survey, while supporting the development of more specific approaches in the promotion of ethical behavior in sports.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Badminton Players’ Moral Intentions: A Factorial Survey Study Into Personal and Contextual Determinants

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is a complex form of psychological processing (Wang and Chen, 2018). Currently, the scales used to measure moral judgment in sport can be divided into those which assess the stages of development of moral judgment Shields, 1984, 1986;Lind, 2006;Proios and Doganis, 2006;Mouratidou et al, 2007Mouratidou et al, , 2008, those which assess value judgment in the sporting context (Hahm, 1989;Calmeiro et al, 2015), those which measure moral behavior judgment in sport (Gibbons et al, 1995;Stephens et al, 1997;Guivernau and Duda, 2002;Kavussanu et al, 2002;Sage et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2007;Romand et al, 2009;Malete et al, 2013;Whitehead et al, 2013;Gurpinar, 2014), and those which assess moral content judgment in sport (Proios, 2010). These scales have made important contributions to the study on moral judgment in sport.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Specifically, the research and development of the existing scales largely focused on revealing the stages of development of moral judgment in sport and on investigating the motivational mechanisms behind moral misconduct in sport, rather than assessing the behavioral choices that lead to such misconduct. In addition, the type of moral misconducts involved in these scales are limited by a lack of systematic and comprehensive organization and analysis of moral misconduct in the sporting context (Gibbons et al, 1995;Stephens et al, 1997;Guivernau and Duda, 2002;Kavussanu et al, 2002;Sage et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2007;Romand et al, 2009;Malete et al, 2013;Whitehead et al, 2013;Gurpinar, 2014). Meanwhile, moral dilemmas have become the most popular experimental paradigm in empirical studies on moral cognition, and have become a preferred paradigm in the field of cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment (Christensen and Gomila, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such a design is closer to real-life scenarios in sport, thereby improving the ecological validity of the related research. Moreover, existing scales primarily focus on a single sport (such as basketball or football) (Romand et al, 2009). Experimental materials regarding moral dilemmas that are applicable to a wide range of sports are still lacking, which leads to difficulties in conducting in-depth research on moral judgment in sport.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of Experimental Materials on Moral Judgment in Sport: Evidence From Chinese Athletes

Chen

Wang

2019

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The existing scales for moral judgment in sport have some limitations when used for cognitive neural research. Developing a set of experimental materials with good validity is thus warranted. The purpose of this study was to develop experimental materials that can be used in cognitive neuroscience research on moral judgment in sport.Design: Study 1 was a qualitative study and Study 2 used a within-subject design. Method:In Study 1, a qualitative method was adopted to assess types of moral misconduct among Chinese athletes, based on news reports of Chinese athletes' moral misconduct collected from the Internet and from interviews with Chinese elite athletes. In Study 2, typical examples were selected from a qualitative analysis based on the types of moral misconduct observed among athletes in Study 1. The examples were then compiled, controlled, and modified. The validity of the developed experimental materials was evaluated. Results:The moral misconduct observed in Chinese athletes can be divided into the following four categories: violent behavior, doping, match-fixing or tanking, and self-reported dishonesty. Subject analysis and item analysis consistently found that the experimental materials developed for moral judgment based on the four categories were significantly different in six aspects, including the rate of participants' agreement to the proposed resolution [F Subject(3, 184) = 236.60, p = 0.00; F Item(3, 156) = 471.17, p = 0.00], decision time [F Subject(3, 184) = 23.69, p = 0.00; F Item(3, 156) = 3.13, p = 0.03], moral conflict [F Subject(3, 184) = 3.70, p = 0.01; F Item(3, 156) = 10.71, p = 0.00], moral acceptability of the behavior [F Subject(3, 184) = 58.22, p = 0.00; F Item(3, 156) = 110.69, p = 0.00], emotional valence [F Subject(3, 184) = 3.41, p = 0.02; F Item(3, 156) = 3.11, p = 0.03], and emotional arousal [F Subject(3, 184) = 1.32, p = 0.27; F Item(3, 156) = 5.09, p = 0.00]. The experimental materials developed were not affected by the type of sport. Conclusions:The developed experimental materials can be used as experimental materials for cognitive neuroscience research on moral judgment in sport.

show abstract

“…En esta perspectiva multivariante de la deportividad, la violencia y la agresividad en el deporte, son especialmente relevantes los marcos teóricos que a continuación se presentan, y en los que se han apoyado las investigaciones para explicar este fenómeno en el ámbito del deporte ; las teorías explicativas del aprendizaje (Weinberg y Gould, 2010; Zinsser, Bunker y Willians, 2001); la teoría de la agresión-frustración (Volkamer, 1971); la teoría estructural del desarrollo moral (Bredemeier y Shields, 1984;Romand, Pantaléon y Cabagno, 2009;Weiss y Bredemeier, 1991); la teoría motivacional de la orientación de metas de logro (Kavussanu y Roberts, 2001;Miller, Roberts y Ommundsen, 2005;Nicholls, 1989; Stephens y Bredemeier, 1996) y la teoría de la autodeterminación (Vallerand, 1987). Sin embargo, como señala Roberts (1995), ningún marco teórico ofrece una explicación completa de las causas de las conductas deportivas o no deportivas.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Evaluación de la violencia y deportividad en el deporte: un análisis bibliométrico

Sáenz¹,

Gimeno

Gutiérrez

et al. 2015

CPD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen: Este trabajo presenta un análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones sobre los instrumentos de evaluación de la deportividad, la agresividad y la violencia en contextos deportivos profesionales y en edad escolar, durante el período 1996 a 2013. Los documentos fueron identi cados en las bases de datos SportDiscus, PsycINFO, Psicodoc y Dialnet, así como en publicaciones e informes de federaciones e instituciones deportivas. Han sido 530 los documentos analizados, de los cuales 35 presentan instrumentos de evaluación. Los documentos obtenidos fueron clasi cados en 5 categorías: método de evaluación, constructos evaluados, agentes sociales evaluados, período temporal y contexto deportivo. Los resultados muestran que la herramienta más utilizada ha sido el cuestionario (76.19%). En segundo lugar, los instrumentos analizados permiten evaluar variables psicológicas relacionadas con la deportividad (14.28%), con la no deportividad (28.57%) o con ambas (57.14%). En tercer lugar, tienden a centrarse en la evaluación del deportista (71.43%). En cuarto lugar, la mayoría permiten ser utilizados en un único momento temporal (85.71%). Finalmente, los instrumentos permiten ser utilizados tanto en ámbitos deportivos profesionales como en edad escolar (66.66%) o exclusivamente en edad escolar (33.33%).

show abstract

Age Differences in Individuals' Cognitive and Behavioral Moral Functioning Responses in Male Soccer Teams

Cited by 20 publications

References 28 publications

Badminton Players’ Moral Intentions: A Factorial Survey Study Into Personal and Contextual Determinants

Badminton Players’ Moral Intentions: A Factorial Survey Study Into Personal and Contextual Determinants

Development of Experimental Materials on Moral Judgment in Sport: Evidence From Chinese Athletes

Evaluación de la violencia y deportividad en el deporte: un análisis bibliométrico

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About