1980
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90310-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-dependent changes in the latency of the pattern visual evoked potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
19
2
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
19
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most importantly, the correlations between age and both visual and auditory delays remained significant after adjusting for sensory acuity. These results suggest that sensory acuity does not play a significant role in our findings, which is consistent with previous studies arguing that optical and retinal factors cannot fully account for age-related delays in the visual evoked response1415162228.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most importantly, the correlations between age and both visual and auditory delays remained significant after adjusting for sensory acuity. These results suggest that sensory acuity does not play a significant role in our findings, which is consistent with previous studies arguing that optical and retinal factors cannot fully account for age-related delays in the visual evoked response1415162228.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Age-related slowing of the neural response evoked by simple visual stimuli such as checkerboards has been observed using event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded with electroencephalography (EEG)14151617. Similar effects have also been found for auditory stimuli18192021, complex visual stimuli such as faces2223242526 and olfactory stimuli1727.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The mirror/projector system has no advantages over the LED system, which has the advantage of producing the most reliable component among scalp-recorded VEPs-the PlOO (P2) component (Stockard et al, 1979;Shearer et al, 1983;Skuse et al, 1984). In our study, the effects of gender and ranges of ages of adult patients and controls had no significant effects on the differences found between these groups (Stockard et al, 1979;Shaw and Cant, 1980). The major disadvantage of pattern-reversal stimulation is related to its sensitivity to the changes in visual acuity, because the pattern response represents only a central visual field area, whereas the flash diffusely stimulates the whole retina.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The latency of the component (P100) is known to increase with age (Asselman, Chadwick & Marsden, 1975;Celesia & Daly, 1977;Shaw &Cant, 1980, and. On the contrary, it has been known that although the waveform of the pattern reversal VECP altered in infants (Spekreijse, 1978), no significant change with age over the rest of the life span was found (Celesia & Daly, 1977;Snyder, Dustman & Shearer, 1981;Halliday et al, 1982, and.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%