1981
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90212-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-dependent changes in the amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
17
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But, the data for amplitude variation in different age-groups is conflicting, with some studies depicting a decrease in the amplitude with age while some suggested that in the adult life the amplitude remained reasonably stable while in the first decade of life the mean amplitude was almost double of the adult value. [6,9] The present study could not find any significant variation in the amplitudes among the various age-groups. The mean interocular latency difference (0.64 ms±0.71) was another PRVEP parameter tested among the various agegroups but no statistically significant variation was found (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…But, the data for amplitude variation in different age-groups is conflicting, with some studies depicting a decrease in the amplitude with age while some suggested that in the adult life the amplitude remained reasonably stable while in the first decade of life the mean amplitude was almost double of the adult value. [6,9] The present study could not find any significant variation in the amplitudes among the various age-groups. The mean interocular latency difference (0.64 ms±0.71) was another PRVEP parameter tested among the various agegroups but no statistically significant variation was found (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…In contrast, N2 is markedly prolonged in the adolescent subject then decreases sharply during the following decade and then progressively increases in latency. The reduction in amplitude of the PVEP recorded from the 70 year old is characteristic of PVEPs in subjects over 60 years (Shaw and Cant, 1981).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Shorter P1 peak latency in adults than in children may reflect the increase in processing speed due to myelinisation (Picton and Taylor, 2007). Several studies have reported that P100 latency stabilizes around 20 years of age (Shaw and Cant, 1981;Allison et al, 1984;Emmerson-Hanover et al, 1994). Here, the P1 peak was 20 ms later in children than in adults, without differences between the two children groups or between the two adult groups.…”
Section: P1-n1 Range: Pre-linguistic Processesmentioning
confidence: 69%