2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age assessment based on dental calcification in individuals with Down syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this study, the chronological age of subjects was calculated from differences between radiographic exposure and date of birth, such as in the study conducted by Leonelli de Moraes et al 18 The research sample consisted of a Down syndrome children group and control group of children in the 6-14 years age range. This age-based retrieval is based on the cervical vertebrae ossification process commencing when the fetus is in the womb and continuing until childhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within this study, the chronological age of subjects was calculated from differences between radiographic exposure and date of birth, such as in the study conducted by Leonelli de Moraes et al 18 The research sample consisted of a Down syndrome children group and control group of children in the 6-14 years age range. This age-based retrieval is based on the cervical vertebrae ossification process commencing when the fetus is in the womb and continuing until childhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth of individuals suffering from the condition is delayed in almost every aspect, including the development of teeth. [16][17][18][19] de Moraes et al 20 studied the chronology of dental mineralization in Down syndrome children and found the dental age of two-thirds of subjects of either gender to be generally more advanced, while that of one-third was delayed, meaning that the majority of patients had normal development. Other studies by de Moraes et al 18 into the chronological analysis of mineralization using Nolla's method concluded that the dental age of Down syndrome individuals is similar to that in normal individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty arises when it comes to individuals with special needs, be it due to a syndrome or other conditions which may modify the expected dental development (18,19). Chromosomal disorders and syndromes arising from numerical and structural defects of chromosomes often include manifestations affecting the craniofacial region, and many of these chromosomal and multifactorial disorders have characteristic oral manifestations, such as multiple ageneses and a late eruption of the deciduous dentition and permanent dentition (6,18,20,21,22). The prevalence of births with chromosomal anomalies was 34.8 cases/10000 births, Down's syndrome being the group of congenital anomalies with a higher prevalence (19.6 cases/10000 births) (23,24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poteškoće se pojavljuju kod pojedinaca s posebnim potrebama, bilo da je riječ o sindromu ili drugim stanjima koja mogu izmijeniti očekivani dentalni razvoj (18,19). Kromosomski poremećaji i sindromi nastali zbog numeričkih i strukturnih oštećenja kromosoma često obuhvaćaju manifestacije koje utječu na kraniofacijalnu regiju, a mnogi od kromosomskih i multifaktorskih poremećaja imaju karakteristične oralne manifestacije poput multiple ageneze i kasne erupcije mliječnih i trajnih zuba (6,18,20,21,22). Prevalencija osoba rođenih s kromosomskim anomalijama iznosila je 34,8 slučajeva na 10 000 rođenja, a Downov sindrom skupina je urođenih anomalija s većom prevalencijom (19,6 slučajeva na 10 000 rođenja) (23,24).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…DS is the most common congenital mental disability [7,23] and it occurs in approximately one in every 700 births. There are more than 5.8 million individuals in the world with DS [3]. These individuals present signs and symptoms that characterize a delay in the development of the motor and mental functions of its carriers, entailing mental and general alterations that may lead to different results if the same criterion is used to evaluate their CA [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%