We read with interest the article by Scaglione et al.[1] on the influence of age on capsule endoscopy (CE) in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGB). We would like to share our observations in this area. We conducted a study to investigate the utility of CE in the elderly with recurrent anaemia ± overt bleeding and impact on subsequent management compared to the younger cohort.A retrospective review of all 779 consecutive patients that underwent CE over a 7-year period (2002-2009) for OGB was conducted. Patients were categorised according to their age: group 1(C70 years) and group 2 (\70 years). Thirty-five percent of patients (n = 272) were C70 years (group 1) with a median age of 76 years (range 70-92 years). The majority of patients in group 1 underwent CE for the indication of recurrent anaemia (n = 200) whilst overt bleeding consisted of 27% (n = 72). The diagnostic yield of CE in group 1 was 53%. There was no significant difference in the yield between those with anaemia or overt bleeding (52% vs. 58%, P = 0.3). The commonest diagnosis in the elderly was angioectasia in 34% of patients, which is consistent with the findings of Scaglione et al. [1] and the published literature [2,3].The other findings included small bowel carcinoid tumours (n = 2), Crohn's disease (n = 2), fresh bleeding in the small bowel (n = 8) small bowel diverticulae (n = 2), small bowel ulcers (n = 18) and miscellaneous (n = 8). In 8% of patients, pathology was found outside the small bowel. On logistic regression, factors which predicted a higher yield with CE included age (P = 0.03), anticoagulation (P = 0.045) and previous blood transfusions (P = 0.04). Management was altered in 33% in the form of enteroscopy ± APC or polypectomy, repeating colonoscopy, surgery for resection of tumour or sewing of angiomata and treatment of peptic ulcer disease.In comparison to patients \70 years, the diagnostic yield was significantly higher in the elderly for both the indication of anaemia (51% vs. 37%, P = 0.003, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5) and overt bleeding (60% vs. 40%, P = 0.007, OR 2, CI 1.2-3.9). Management was also altered in a significant greater proportion of the elderly (P = 0.002, OR 1.8, CI 1.3-2.5).Our study supports the findings of Scaglione et al.[1] in that CE not only has a higher diagnostic yield in the elderly with OGB but that increasing age is a predictive factor for a yield with CE [2]. In addition, our study has also demonstrated that CE has a positive impact on the subsequent management in this group. Age should not be a barrier to performing CE in the elderly. Conflict of interest None.References 1. Scaglione G, Russo F, Franco MR, Sarracco P, Pietrini L, Sorrentini I. Age and video capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective study on hospitalized patients. Dig Dis Sci.