2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and height effects on the center of mass and center of pressure inclination angles during obstacle-crossing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility of bias in this study, with respect to improvements in the variables observed at the post-training evaluations, may have been an in luence of excessive attention and motivation of volunteers. This motivation factor had already been found in previous studies (33). Moreover, the proposition of tasks without giving priority (34) to one or another task did not allow us to clearly detect any interference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Another possibility of bias in this study, with respect to improvements in the variables observed at the post-training evaluations, may have been an in luence of excessive attention and motivation of volunteers. This motivation factor had already been found in previous studies (33). Moreover, the proposition of tasks without giving priority (34) to one or another task did not allow us to clearly detect any interference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…27 Thus, the task poses high demands on balance control and the ability to modify movement kinetics, kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters to conform with the size of obstacles on the floor. [7][8][9]27 Then repetitive practice of the obstacle crossing task facilitated the improvement of functional ability as measured using the TUGT, FTSST and 10MWT. Importantly, the improvement was clearly seen in participants with chronic SCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the task poses greater demands on the balance control, lower extremity motor strength and walking ability than unobstructed walking. [6][7][8][9] Currently, there is rare evidence on the incorporation of obstacle crossing training into rehabilitation practice for patients with SCI. Musselman et al 10 reported the benefit of an intensive and variable skill walking training program (including obstacle crossing) to improve walking ability in four participants with SCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were the final points used in calculating clearances The foot was projected onto a plane created from the vector of the stair's edge. Normal biomechanics were assumed, allowing the inference that ascending stairs would leave the toe closer to the edge and descending would leave the heel closer [15,25]. Therefore, heel clearance was analyzed for descending trials, whereas toe clearance was analyzed for ascending trials.…”
Section: Kinematic Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%