2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(00)00753-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ag growth on N-modified Cu(111) surfaces: potential three-dimensional quantum confinement structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a configuration can be simply understood by considering that Au(111) has substantially a lower surface energy (SE) than Cu(111) (1.50 vs 1.83 J/m 2 ). Therefore, the bimetal system tends to expose the Au layer to gain a lower energy. Such a rule also fits with the fact of growing Cu films on Ag(111) (SE ≈ 1.25 J/m 2 ) and Pt(111) (SE ≈ 2.48 J/m 2 ), which forms Ag-top/Cu-sub and Cu-top/Pt-sub structures, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a configuration can be simply understood by considering that Au(111) has substantially a lower surface energy (SE) than Cu(111) (1.50 vs 1.83 J/m 2 ). Therefore, the bimetal system tends to expose the Au layer to gain a lower energy. Such a rule also fits with the fact of growing Cu films on Ag(111) (SE ≈ 1.25 J/m 2 ) and Pt(111) (SE ≈ 2.48 J/m 2 ), which forms Ag-top/Cu-sub and Cu-top/Pt-sub structures, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Previous studies of the Ag film on Cu(111) reported a (9 × 9) superstructure with similar triangular features. In that case, the superlattice was deduced from overlapping the Ag(111) lattice (0.288 nm) with the Cu(111) substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Most importantly, however, addition of the second Ag monolayer resulted in the breakdown of covalent binding, between both Ag layers and the Cu slab (see pDOS lack of Ag/Cu t 1u populations in Figure 1b).It was, thus, concluded that while surface growth of a single Ag monolayer is feasible, growth of consecutive monolayers is not a possibility. It has to be noted that this finding is in some contrast with the experimentally observed growth of up to four atomic layers of Ag (111) on Cu (111) [27].…”
Section: Surface Growth Of Ag Monolayerscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The current work was motivated by the facility to create three-dimensional quantum confinement structures by restricting epitaxial growth of a quantum-well material to nanometer-scale regions (e.g., [27]) and reports on the possibility of surface growth, inter-diffusion, and alloying of Ag (001) monolayers on Cu (001) from the standpoint of DFT total formation energy.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%