After the Drought: The Impact of Microinsurance on Consumption Smoothing and Asset Protection

Abstract

To cope with shocks, poor households with inadequate access to financial markets can sell assets to smooth consumption and, or reduce consumption to protect assets. Both coping strategies can be economically costly and contribute to the transmission of poverty, yet limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of insurance to mitigate these costs in risk‐prone developing economies. Utilizing data from an RCT in rural Kenya, this paper estimates that on average an innovative microinsurance scheme reduces both forms of costly coping. Threshold econometrics grounded in theory reveal a more complex pattern: (i) wealthier households primarily cope by selling assets, and insurance makes them 96 percentage points less likely to sell assets following a shock; (ii) poorer households cope primarily by cutting food consumption, and insurance reduces by 49 percentage points their reliance on this strategy.

Impact of formal climate risk transfer mechanisms on risk-aversion: Empirical evidence from rural Ethiopia

“…Based on our findings in subsection 4.2.3, change in risk-aversion may be a plausible mechanism through which WICI uptake causes an effect on farmers' risk-taking behaviour in their agricultural investment decisions − adoption of mineral fertilizers. WICI improves the households' circumstances since the insurance payouts during negative rainfall shocks can stabilise income and ensure smooth consumption (Janzen and Carter, 2018). Thus, WICI uptake reduces the income and consumption variability related with agricultural households' production decisions.…”

The Impact of Positive Agricultural Income Shocks on Rural Chinese Households

“…First, a large literature has analyzed the effects of income shocks, both negative and positive, on developing country households' pattern of asset-holdings and livelihood diversification. A number of papers provide evidence that households facing negative shocks derived from adverse weather outcomes or natural disasters experience asset disinvestment as well as consumption declines, and these effects are particularly salient for poor households (Carter, Little, Mogues and Negatu, 2007;Janzen and Carter, 2013;Hoddinott, 2006). In analyzing positive shocks, by contrast, evaluate the effects of exchange rate and food aid shocks on household diversification in Cote d'Ivoire and Kenya.…”

Poor Households' Productive Investments of Cash Transfers: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Niger

“…Similarly, the poverty traps literature predicts a differentiated impact of shocks on asset and consumption smoothing for the lowest and highest income groups (seeJanzen & Carter, 2013;Zimmerman & Carter, 2003).…”