Abstract:This paper considers the impact of online distribution on the long-term availability and preservation of African cinema. It examines the case of M-Net's African Film Library (AFL), a video on demand library of classic African films that was launched in 2012, but taken offline by 2013. The paper argues that this short-lived project represents a pivotal moment in the way we think about African film archiving and distribution, in which new technologies and consequently disintermediated business models promised to… Show more
“…Had it been successful, the website would have offered a comprehensive cross-section of African film history, but unfortunately the project was abandoned before the site was even functional. As I have discussed elsewhere (Fisher 2018), M-Net's disbandment of this project represented a major blow to the accessibility and discoverability of the content, but perhaps more importantly it raised critical questions regarding the future preservation of the material; M-Net had presumably secured the films' rights in perpetuity, a monopoly which restricts the 'safety net' of ongoing reproduction and dissemination of the works through DVD and other physical media.…”
Section: The Precarity Of African Film Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the case of the African Film Library was an early challenge to the cybertopian narrative in which the availability of niche and marginal material would vastly improve, demonstrating how easily this could result in a threat to their long-term preservation, with the ever-increasing dependency on online retrieval of material giving unprecedented control of access to its new, more powerful gatekeepers, in turn placing its preservation at the beck and call of commercial demands (Fisher 2018). These problems hold true for Netflix's inventory, which will be secure provided the company continues to benefit financially, but whose preservation could be under threat if it does not.…”
Section: The Precarity Of African Film Onlinementioning
A. (2022). Netflix and Africa: streaming, branding and tastemaking in non-domestic African film markets. In S. Baschiera , & A. Fisher (Eds.), World cinema on demand: global film cultures in the era of online distribution Bloomsbury Academic.
“…Had it been successful, the website would have offered a comprehensive cross-section of African film history, but unfortunately the project was abandoned before the site was even functional. As I have discussed elsewhere (Fisher 2018), M-Net's disbandment of this project represented a major blow to the accessibility and discoverability of the content, but perhaps more importantly it raised critical questions regarding the future preservation of the material; M-Net had presumably secured the films' rights in perpetuity, a monopoly which restricts the 'safety net' of ongoing reproduction and dissemination of the works through DVD and other physical media.…”
Section: The Precarity Of African Film Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the case of the African Film Library was an early challenge to the cybertopian narrative in which the availability of niche and marginal material would vastly improve, demonstrating how easily this could result in a threat to their long-term preservation, with the ever-increasing dependency on online retrieval of material giving unprecedented control of access to its new, more powerful gatekeepers, in turn placing its preservation at the beck and call of commercial demands (Fisher 2018). These problems hold true for Netflix's inventory, which will be secure provided the company continues to benefit financially, but whose preservation could be under threat if it does not.…”
Section: The Precarity Of African Film Onlinementioning
A. (2022). Netflix and Africa: streaming, branding and tastemaking in non-domestic African film markets. In S. Baschiera , & A. Fisher (Eds.), World cinema on demand: global film cultures in the era of online distribution Bloomsbury Academic.
“…16 For example, Fisher, in his analysis of the short-lived African Film Library, points to the emergence of a powerful new intermediary and suggests that "the streaming model is more likely to threaten the availability of niche films, rather than preserve it." 17 He notes the potential precariousness of availability (and especially of long-term archival access) that can occur when online distributors attain an unprecedented level of control over content. Although Fisher's analysis remains entrenched in distribution and long-tail exploitation, his concerns begin to approach some of the implications of streaming for national cinemas.…”
This article explores how international over-the-top services impact the national feature film value chain in Canada and Australia. The main objective of this exploration is to interrogate the tendency to classify Netflix as television—whether in the context of broadcasting policy or in light of disciplinary biases that tend to separate media industry studies from the more cinephilic text-focused approaches of film studies. By equating entertainment services like Netflix with television, the discussion of how feature films will sustain themselves in a rapidly changing market becomes sidelined. Examining examples from Canada and Australia, we seek to draw attention to the ways in which film sustains and develops its industry and how services like Netflix relate to policy mechanisms designed to foster national cinema. This article offers an intervention into the developing discourse around Netflix as television to ask the question: what does it mean to consider Netflix as cinema?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.