The field of plant science has grown dramatically in the past two decades, but global disparities and systemic inequalities persist. Here, we analyzed ~300,000 papers published over the past two decades to quantify disparities across nations, genders, and taxonomy in the plant science literature. Our analyses reveal striking geographical biases, where affluent nations dominate the publishing landscape and vast areas of the globe have virtually no footprint in the literature. Authors in Northern America are cited nearly twice as many times as authors based in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, despite publishing in journals with similar impact factors. Gender imbalances show remarkably little improvement over time, and some of the most affluent nations have extremely male biased publication records, despite supposed improvements in gender equality. In addition we find that most studies focus on economically important crop and model species and a wealth of biodiversity is under-represented in the literature. Taken together, our analyses reveal a problematic system of publication, with persistent bias that poorly captures the global wealth of scientific knowledge and biological diversity. We conclude by highlighting immediately addressable disparities and suggestions for long-term solutions to improve equity in the plant sciences.