2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-004-6376-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AFLP Analysis of the Phenetic Organization and Genetic Diversity in the Sugarcane Complex, Saccharum and Erianthus

Abstract: Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers were evaluated for determining the phylogenetic relationships, and the diversity in the Saccharum complex using 30 clones belonging to S. officinarum, S. robustum, S. spontaneum, S. barberi, S. sinense and the related genus Erianthus. The phenetic tree of the species clones based on AFLP data was consistent with the known taxonomical relationships. AFLP gave higher resolution of closely related species into discrete groups than that by RAPD and RFLP markers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the genome size of S. spontaneum varies between accessions, reflecting the wide range of chromosome The chromosomes numbers analysis were furnished by Rao (1983) * The chromosome numbers were corrected based on the estimated genome sizes number variations in this species (Irvine 1999). The variation of genome sizes among S. spontanum can be explained by distinctively greater diversity within S. spontaneum compared to other Saccharum species, which was demonstrated by RFLP (Burnquist et al 1992;Lu et al 1994;Nair et al 1999), AFLP (Selvi et al 2006), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Nair et al 1999;Pan et al 2004), and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers (Selvi et al 2003). S. robustum is thought to be the ancestral species of S. officinarum (Brandes 1956;Sreenivasan et al 1987;Daniels and Roach 1987;Grivet et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the genome size of S. spontaneum varies between accessions, reflecting the wide range of chromosome The chromosomes numbers analysis were furnished by Rao (1983) * The chromosome numbers were corrected based on the estimated genome sizes number variations in this species (Irvine 1999). The variation of genome sizes among S. spontanum can be explained by distinctively greater diversity within S. spontaneum compared to other Saccharum species, which was demonstrated by RFLP (Burnquist et al 1992;Lu et al 1994;Nair et al 1999), AFLP (Selvi et al 2006), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Nair et al 1999;Pan et al 2004), and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers (Selvi et al 2003). S. robustum is thought to be the ancestral species of S. officinarum (Brandes 1956;Sreenivasan et al 1987;Daniels and Roach 1987;Grivet et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very few first hybrids obtained were extensively intercrossed, generating hundreds of sugarcane varieties that in turn determined a very narrow genetic base for the sugarcane crop (Selvi et al 2006). Despite the breakthrough in sugarcane improvement, an apparent plateau has been reached in terms of sugar concentration, and selection for new higher yielding varieties has proven to be difficult (Ming et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of sugarcane germplasm, the genetic variability has been estimated using different molecular markers, such as random fragment length polymorphism (RFLP;D'Hont et al 1994;Janoo et al 1999;Coto et al 2002;Schenck et al 2004), ribosomal DNA (Glaszmann et al 1990), microsatellites (Piperidis et al 2000;Pan et al 2003;Cordeiro et al 2003;Pinto et al 2006;), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP; Hoarau et al 2002;Lima et al 2002;Aitken et al 2006;Selvi et al 2006). Most of these markers reflect the genetic variability in noncoding or repetitive DNA regions of the genome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple sequence repeat (SSR) analysis showed that S. spontaneum clones may have significantly higher variation than S. barberi clones (Singh et al 2010). The distinctively greater diversity within S. spontaneum than that of the other five species was additionally supported by RFLP Lu, D'Hont, Walker, et al 1994;Nair et al 1999), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Selvi et al 2006), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Nair et al 1999), and SSR markers (Selvi et al 2003).…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 93%