2012
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2012.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affordability of water supply in Mongolia: empirical lessons for measuring affordability

Abstract: Affordability of water services is a pressing water policy issue for both the developed and, in particular, for the developing world. Despite its well-known theoretical shortcomings, affordability analysis of water supply has, up to now, been widely based on the ratio of a household's water expenditure to its income, the Conventional Affordability Ratio (CAR). However, in the housing sector, alternative concepts for measuring affordability have been developed, among them being the ‘Potential Affordability Appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…101 An example is the 10% measure that is used in the United Kingdom to evaluate the incidence of fuel poverty.…”
Section: Affordability Of Energy Services and Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…101 An example is the 10% measure that is used in the United Kingdom to evaluate the incidence of fuel poverty.…”
Section: Affordability Of Energy Services and Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An affordability issue arises when this ratio exceeds some normatively set threshold, which is typically set between two to five percent (Komives et al, 2005). Gawel et al (2013) show that this approach has important conceptual shortcomings as it does not account for relative preferences for water and other commodities and also neglects that even poor households may consume more water than necessary.…”
Section: 1 Affordability Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affordability is more difficult to operationalize. Gawel et al find that the widely used conventional affordability ratio (CAR), which defines water as affordable if less than a certain percentage of household income is spent on it, has both the risks of under-and overstating actual affordability problems in different situations [36,37]. The authors point to the fact that the CAR would, for example, diagnose low-income households to have no affordability problem if their consumption was low enough, while it might categorize the costs of a very wasteful water consumption of a high-income household as unaffordable.…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%